Skip to main content

AN 5.161, AN 5.162: I solved a few mysteries this week, regarding mudita and upekkha as part of 4 brahma viharas


4👑☸ Cattāri Ariya-saccaṃ 四聖諦

4👑☸ → AN 5.161      AN   DN   KN   MN   SN   (⤴)

AN 5.161


Why is mudita missing from AN 5.161? It jumps from karuna right to upekkha.

It's because the entirety of the next sutta, AN 5.161 is completely dealing with mudita. This is an interesting feature of EBT, where it often doesn't tell you things in such explicit wording like you would expect in a college textbook or legal document. You have to read and examine very carefully to notice important details like this. If you do a text search for "mudit" (mudita and conjugations) in those 3 suttas, it doesn't appear! But it's omission from AN 5.161 and the theme from the following sutta makes it incontrovertible that mudita as a brahma-vihara is the topic.

Here, I did a detailed comphrensive research on mudita, piti, pamojja (conjugated form of mudita). For mudita, I searched "mudit" in DPR and looked at EVERY SINGLE SUTTA occurrence of that term. The results are here:
http://www.lucid24.org/sted/7sb/4piti/book/index.html

mudita/pamojja, much like "sukha" in 7sb☀️ = satta bojjh-aṅga , are shadow factors. They don't officially appear in the list of 7, but if you have passaddhi/pacification, then sukha is there like a shadow (unless samadhi is 4th jhana or higher). Similarly, piti-sambojjhanga has mudita/pamojja joined like a twin or shadow.  

Mudita is not ordinary gladness/enjoyment. It's altruistic-mirth that delights in virtue, that delights in Dharma that leads to viraga, nirodha, nirvana. 

Mystery of mudita in 4bv solved

So the question I asked on the forums earlier, now as its answer. I noted that in the EBT, and Vimt. (vimuttimagga), mudita as one of 4bv ☮️= 4 Brahma vihāras , only talked about happiness at noticing virtuous qualties in onesself and others. Whereas Vism. seems to go off on a tangent and talk about non-jealousy.

AN 5.161 and AN 5.162 gives the answer. Notice both suttas are spoken by Sariputta, not the Buddha. Often late Theravada ideas, you'll see they try to pin the credit (or blame?) on Sariputta, for ideas that are not in the EBT. Especially for the 5th factor in AN 5.192, where the person one has resentment towards has no blemish, but one has resentment towards them. That's the 'jealousy' angle the Vism. talks about.

Mystery solved: of  4bv Upekkha relationship to 'kamma-saka: it's karma, sucka!'

in AN 5.191, since mudita is omitted and treated in detail in AN 5.192, then the last two factors of AN 5.191, 'forget and ignore', and 'kamma-saka', are clearly expanding on upekkha.  Again, I think this is an idea from late Theravada, due to it being spoken by Sariputta. In the other sutta references where the Buddha talks about it, it's not connected to upekkha as a 4bv, or upekkha in general.
http://www.lucid24.org/tped/k/kamma/book/index.html




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex