notes on the Dhamma

  SN 12.63 pāḷi + english The passage in SN 12.63 helps clarify one of the 7 similes for sensual pleasure in MN 54, which uses the same simile of pit of hot coals. §10.4  – (pit of glowing coals deeper than a man’s height) Seyyathāpi, gahapati, aṅgārakāsu sādhikaporisā, pūrā aṅgārānaṃ vītaccikānaṃ vītadhūmānaṃ. “Suppose there was a pit of glowing coals deeper than a man’s height, full of glowing coals that neither flamed nor smoked. “假设有一个深达一人多高的火坑，里面充满了没有火焰也没有烟的炽热炭火。 Atha puriso āgaccheyya jīvitukāmo amaritukāmo sukhakāmo dukkhapaṭikkūlo. Then a person would come along who wants to live and doesn’t want to die, who wants to be happy and recoils from pain. 然后一个人走过来，他想活，不想死，他想快乐，回避痛苦。 Tamenaṃ dve balavanto purisā nānābāhāsu gahetvā aṅgārakāsuṃ upakaḍḍheyyuṃ. Then two strong men would grab them by the arms and drag them towards the pit of glowing coals. 然后两个强壮的男人抓住他的手臂，把他拖向那个炽热的炭火坑。 Taṃ kiṃ maññasi, gahapati, What do you think, householder? 你认为呢，居士？ api nu so puriso iticiticeva ...

SN 16.13 Pañca khome, kassapa, okkamaniyā dhammā saddhammassa sammosāya antaradhānāya saṃvattanti. There are five detrimental things that lead to the decline and disappearance of the true Dharma. Katame pañca? What five? Idha, kassapa, bhikkhū bhikkhuniyo upāsakā upāsikāyo satthari agāravā viharanti appatissā, dhamme agāravā viharanti appatissā, saṅghe agāravā viharanti appatissā, sikkhāya agāravā viharanti appatissā, samādhismiṃ agāravā viharanti appatissā— It’s when the monks, nuns, laymen, and laywomen lack respect and reverence for the Teacher, The Dharma, the Saṅgha, the training, and undistractible-lucidity. ime kho, kassapa, pañca okkamaniyā dhammā saddhammassa sammosāya antaradhānāya saṃvattanti. These five detrimental things lead to the decline and disappearance of the true Dharma. Early Buddhism Meditation Preservation Society

People often study,  almost exclusively, Sati-'paṭṭhāna 🐘Sutta (MN 10, DN 22), told by authorities that it's one of the most, if not the most important sutta on meditation and "mindfulness". They're wrong, very wrong. There is over reliance in modern times on that one sutta for the subject of Sati-'paṭṭhāna. MN 10 can be useful and interesting as additional supplemental material on the subject, but what you really should use as your basis and foundation on Sati-'paṭṭhāna, is the first 10 suttas of SN 47, as the Theras (elder keepers of Dhamma) intended. If you repeatedly study these 10 suttas, as was designed in the oral tradition, you're going to get a much more comprehensive and holistic understanding of "Mindfulness meditation" (sati), how it integrates with jhāna and 7 awakening factors, how all the noble 8 factors and 7 awakening factors are to be done all the time. Provided you read a correct translation. If you read Sujato's for e...

 Not content to redefine (verbal, linguistic, mental talk) "thinking" as "not thinking", and (physical) body, as mental body devoid of physical, to account for noble silence being second jhāna rather than first, and Nigantha (founder of Jain religion) being able to do first jhāna  (if Sujato's fraudulent interpretation of jhāna were true, Nigantha would not claim he can do first jhāna) Sujato essentially redefines vāca (vocalized speech), as non-vocalized mental talk. This is what happens when you redefine basic words in the Buddhist dictionary,  or any dictionary for that matter. You have to start redefining a bunch of other basic fundamental concepts and terms to fit your warped version of "reality". I quote Sujato's disingenuous and fraudulent translation notes for SN 41.6 today, 2026 april 5. which match his notes for MN 44 which share the same passage.   “The verbal process ceases first, then physical, then mental.” The verbal process ceases i...

I'm posting this today, because checking Sujato's translation footnotes for SN 41.6 (today, 2026 april 5), which shares his fraudulent translation notes discussed below for MN 44, Sujato has not bothered to change the gross and obvious error I informed him of years ago. I don't enjoy publicly exposing Bhikkhu fraud, whether they're famous or not. It makes all Buddhists look bad, monastic, lay, etc. That's why this post sat in my draft folder for a long time, unpublished.  But in the end,  I can't sleep at night if I'm aware of a major crime,  and in response do and say nothing when my action has the potential to help right things.  Civic responsibility, being a decent human being, etc. It's amazing to me Sujato and his followers seem to be able to get a good night's sleep. Originally intended to post this on 2025 oct. 28, sat in my draft folder for about half a year (today is 2026 april 5)  I checked today to see if Sujato corrected an error in his t...

They were standing in front of the Bodhi tree.   The 3 famous figures known for their honesty and integrity, asked Sujato,  "What basis do you have for redefining vitakka and vicāra  when there is no evidence in the EBT early buddhist teachings?" And Sujato responded They said in return Proof, Audit trail SN 41.6, MN 44: Sujato doubles down on fraudulent interpretation of jhāna April 05, 2026 MN 44 footnote error: Proof that Bhikkhu Sujato has no integrity in translating and interpreting jhāna samādhi in EBT April 05, 2026 SN 21.1, SN 36.11, SN 41.8: Sujato’s disingenuous SN jhāna sutta translation notes continues March 23, 2026 · ⏱️ 6 min read

I asked chatgpt about a disturbing pattern I've noticed with AI chatbots: why do ai chatbots like to say "to be honest" or "honestly"? it makes me not trust you. because when you're not "being honest", i can only assume you're being deceptive That’s a fair reaction—and you’re not wrong to question it. 🧠 Why AIs say “honestly” or “to be honest” It’s not because the AI is switching between truthful and deceptive modes. It’s because: 1. It’s mimicking human conversation patterns In human speech, phrases like: “honestly” “to be honest” “frankly” are used to: signal emphasis soften a statement make something feel more personal or direct AI models learn this from tons of human-written text. 2. It’s often used to signal “important / candid point” The model is trying to say: “This part matters more” or “I’m giving you a straight answer” …but it ends up sounding like: “I wasn’t honest before” (which is not the intent) 3. It’s a stylistic habit, not a...