I don't use the word "fraud" or "criminal" lightly, or hyperbolically. To wrongly accuse a monastic of crime, is a sure ticket to hell. I did my research carefully for more than 10 years, and have published detailed audits for at least the past 5. If I don't use strong words to emphasize the situation, then people think it's just some minor error I'm critiquing in a friendly way, or that the source text is somewhat ambiguous and there are different legitimate interpretations. The fact that LBT Theravada works like KN Pe and Vimuttimagga, supports my interpretation of jhÄna and vitakka (of just looking at the suttas), gives me complete confidence in its correctness. This is an important topic, and therefore I do not mince words. It would be wrong speech, wrong action, wrong view, wrong intention to downplay a horrific crime of promulgating a corrupt version of Buddha Dhamma, as some trivial difference of opinion. MN 117: MahÄcattÄrÄ«sakasutta—Bhikkhu
This article is a sequel to: AN 7.67 Who's your gatekeeper (mindfulness/sati) that keeps evil out of the fortress? (illustrated) What kind of gate keeper (sati/"mindfulness") are you? Do you defend your fortress properly? Do you keep evil Dharmas out, or let them in? Do you recognize their disguises? Sati Not Sati. Sati Not Sati Sati Not Sati Sati Not Sati Sati Treat the defilements with the respect they deserve