Skip to main content

been there, done that: evaṃ-nāmo evaṃ-gotto, evaṃ-vaṇṇo evam-āhāro...

1st story, the book report

In my childhood American public school education, from kindergarten to 12th grade, there were only two times that I encountered topics in class that I was genuinely intimidated.  School was easy. With little effort I could get an 'A' (highest grade) in any subject I desired.  That's not bragging, that's a testament to the (poor) quality of American public education. 

The first subject that freaked me out was pre-calculus *.

The second subject that totally freaked me out, happened in 3rd grade (8 or 9 year old child). We were reading a children's story that was maybe 10 pages long, and this was the first time as kids we were asked to write a book report.  Now I understood what a book report was asking for. You were suppose to condense the meaning of the story into a short summary. Why did this freak me out? Because I could not for the life of me figure out what details of the story were important and what was trivial and could be disregarded. It's a children's story! Something like a boy and his dog were walking around a neighborhood and had an encounter with a neighbor. That's my adult educated and experienced mind able to summarize the essence of the children's story into one line, but think about a 3rd grade 8 year old boy. I didn't have a sufficient vocabulary yet, didn't have the life experience and perspective needed to sort out what was relatively more important and relatively a trivial detail. Every detail seemed equally important! I sweated and struggled to pick out what parts to summarize, and fully expected to get a fail on that paper, despite my best effort. I ended up getting a 'B' or 'A' (highest mark). Afterwards, I was still freaked out, because I had no idea what was correct, what was wrong, what I needed to do to make it better or what I could have done that would scored lower. In contrast, in math and other subjects, correct and wrong are very clear even for children. I'm still mad about the book report incident to this day. It was inhumane and irresponsible of the educators to not make it clear that they weren't expecting a 3rd grader to produce an accurate summary with no clear criteria of what was good quality output and what was poor quality. Probably all they were looking for was the grammar and punctuation that was expected  of a 3rd grader, and that the details in the summary should be consistent with the book.

Now I'm going to connect that point with an important Dharma:

(from the standard formula on recollection of past lives)
evaṃ-nāmo evaṃ-gotto
(I had) such-(a)-name, such-(a)-clan,
evaṃ-vaṇṇo evam-āhāro
such-(an)-appearance, such-(was my)-food,
evaṃ-sukha-dukkhap-paṭisaṃvedī
such-pleasure-(and)-pain-(I)-experienced,
evam-āyu-pariyanto,
such-(my)-age-limit [expired].
so tato cuto
he, (from) that-state, passed-away,
idhū-(u)papanno’ti.
here, (re)-arose


Even if you don't believe in past lives and rebirth, this formula excerpt is an extremely powerful mantra (an important principle to recite out loud or silently, and reflect upon frequently). 

Each phase of your life is like a death and a rebirth. The 3rd grader with their circle of friends, the middle school hormonal rage period with a new circle of friends or feeling of being alienated, high school years pondering the meaning of life, college, getting your first job, first girl friend, first kid, etc. 

If you were to write a book report for each of those phases, what would it look like?
If you asked me decades ago, maybe I could write entire books, not just a short book report, on each phase. But now?

grade school phase: been there, done that: evaṃ-nāmo evaṃ-gotto, evaṃ-vaṇṇo evam-āhāro...
middle school phase: been there, done that: evaṃ-nāmo evaṃ-gotto, evaṃ-vaṇṇo evam-āhāro...
high school...:  been there, done that: evaṃ-nāmo evaṃ-gotto, evaṃ-vaṇṇo evam-āhāro...
first job...: been there, done that: evaṃ-nāmo evaṃ-gotto, evaṃ-vaṇṇo evam-āhāro...

2nd story, the video game addict

When I was a kid, I loved video games. My mom was always complaining and preventing me from playing video games to my heart's content (maybe only satisfying 30-50% of the length of time I desired), resulting in building an even greater uncontrollable desire to play once I moved out and went to college, where I could play all I wanted as an independent adult.  You better believe countless hours were wasted.

When I was 25, I finally had an awakening. After playing one of the Nintendo Mario adventure games to it's conclusion, I reflected on my experience. This game was the state of the art, one of the masterpieces and critically acclaimed video game experiences of all time. Just to pick an even number, let's say it took 100 hours to complete. While it offered great joy in the realm of sensual pleasures via the stimulating visuals, sounds, music, interactive tactile control and immersive experience in a stunning alternate world, if I really took an accurate accounting, probably:
10% of that was really joyful time spent
50% of the time was kind of neutral, neither particularly pleasurable nor painful
40% of the time you're angry at the game designers for putting frustrating elements and wasting your time forcing you to do frivolous and dumb things just to provide an illusion that you 'earned' the story's conclusion by wasting countless hours doing arbitrary frivolous trivial inane mini quests.

Now keep in mind, this game was a masterpiece, and if the best game available can only offer me a pleasure ratio of only 10%, why am I wasting my time doing this stupidity?

In comparison, low quality and mediocre games, I could expect ratios of maybe 2-5% pleasure and well over 70% anger and frustration.

Upon that deep reflection, I stopped playing video games that day and never played again.

One final  remark on that Mario game. After I spent well over 100 hours completing that game, do you know what the ultimate reward was? Something like a short one minute animation of the princess I rescued giving me a cake or some cookies. 100 hours of sweat and tears for a box of cookies? Never again.

been there, done that: evaṃ-nāmo evaṃ-gotto, evaṃ-vaṇṇo evam-āhāro...

How many thousands of hours had I wasted in my 25 year old life on stupid video games?
I was such a dumb ass. 


3rd story, the books, movies, television

I don't remember the age but I was young, 6th grader or younger. The first book series that I read that was totally immersive, and became my whole world, was 'little house on the prairie' by Laura Ingalls Wilder. I just checked google to see if I got the name and spelling of the author correct, and it was. Decades after not thinking about the book, I could still remember some details like that accurately. 

By immersion, what I mean is I felt like I was in that world. It's amazing that words on a page can make you feel like you're breathing the air of the frontier, as if you were actually there yourself with all of those characters.
 
When I finished reading that book series, I was devastated, because that immersive world ended, almost as if all of the characters in her story were my family and relatives and had all abandoned me in loneliness and depression.  

The melancholy and mild depression lasted weeks. 

How did that depression end? I started some other novel, don't remember the genre. I had a wide range of tastes and interests. Charles Dickens was a favorite, classics, fantasy, science fiction. 

I could list some titles, but why? You know how it ends in each case, be it the great American novel, movies, television shows, or an inane children's book. 

been there, done that: evaṃ-nāmo evaṃ-gotto, evaṃ-vaṇṇo evam-āhāro...

How many thousands of hours wasted on video games, and stories?
I was such a dumb ass. 
Depression and melancholy were never fixed, just temporarily set aside until the next story reached the same predictable conclusion. 


Conclusion


Stop being a dumb ass.
Get up, look away, exit stage left. 
Whenever you find the urge to engage in a book, movie, video game, remember (sati) that you know the ending already. At best, all you get is a picture of a princess with a box of cookies. But that's a bait and switch! Princess is going to get old and ugly and your cookies are going to excrete. 

(from the standard formula on recollection of past lives)
evaṃ-nāmo evaṃ-gotto
(I had) such-(a)-name, such-(a)-clan,
evaṃ-vaṇṇo evam-āhāro
such-(an)-appearance, such-(was my)-food,
evaṃ-sukha-dukkhap-paṭisaṃvedī
such-pleasure-(and)-pain-(I)-experienced,
evam-āyu-pariyanto,
such-(my)-age-limit [expired].
so tato cuto
he, (from) that-state, passed-away,
idhū-(u)papanno’ti.
here, (re)-arose

If the Buddha was was the teacher, that's the book report he's looking for, and you'd get an A+ without having to even read that thick book or watch the movie. Now that is a good deal worth taking every time. 
What are you going to do with all that time you save? May I suggest: 
 AN‍   DN‍   KN‍   MN‍   SN‍
Better yet, listen to it on audio, while walking, jogging, biking,  making your body and mind healthy at the same time, feeding two birds with one scone. 

Oh what bliss, to realize that there is no bliss going down the wrong path.

footnotes


1. The first subject that freaked me out was pre-calculus, 

the class that comes the year before calculus. In hindsight, it wasn't my fault. What was intimidating about the subject was I couldn't easily grasp the underlying principles of how it worked. I could score an 'A' on the class following the instructions, but it would be like doing black magic or chanting magic mantras that worked, but I didn't understand why it worked like all of the math classes prior to calculus, where math has an intuitive and logical basis you can see and feel. It was a struggle, but eventually I was able to understand the core principles of how calculus worked. Then the next year when I took the actual calculus class, it was easy because I had done the hard part of understanding the underlying mechanism in precalulus the previous year. But they never explained to us in pre-calculus that they really didn't expect you to understand the underlying principles right away. I wish the educators who designed the curriculum were more humane and just explained that this subject is going to be very difficult, they don't expect you get grasp it completely in precalculus and the second time around in calculus it would start to sink in and make sense.

Why am I sharing this story on calculus? Meditation and dhamma teachers  need to exercise some of foresight in anticipating what things are difficult and explain that students shouldn't expect to get quick results or understand principles right away. Many things in Dhamma and meditation take decades to sink in and understand. 

2.  The standard formula on the power of recollection of past lives, 


6ab → 4♾️🏠 aneka-vihitaṃ pubbe-nivāsaṃ: many dwellings of previous lives

aneka-vihitaṃ pubbe-nivāsaṃ
many-instances (of) previous-abodes-[lives]
anus-sarati,
(he) recollects,
seyyathidaṃ –
like-this -
ekampi jātiṃ dvepi jātiyo tissopi jātiyo catassopi jātiyo pañcapi jātiyo
one birth, two births, three births, four births, five births,
dasapi jātiyo vīsampi jātiyo tiṃsampi jātiyo cattālīsampi jātiyo paññāsampi jātiyo
ten births, twenty births, thirty births, forty births, fifty births,
jāti-satampi jāti-sahassampi jāti-sata-sahassampi
one hundred births, one thousand births, one hundred thousand births,
anekepi saṃvaṭṭa-kappe
many contractions-(of cosmic)-aeons,
anekepi vivaṭṭa-kappe
many expansions-(of cosmic)-aeons,
anekepi saṃvaṭṭa-vivaṭṭa-kappe –
many contractions-&-expansions-(of cosmic)-aeons, [recollecting],
‘amutrāsiṃ
There
evaṃ-nāmo evaṃ-gotto
(I had) such-(a)-name, such-(a)-clan,
evaṃ-vaṇṇo evam-āhāro
such-(an)-appearance, such-(was my)-food,
evaṃ-sukha-dukkhap-paṭisaṃvedī
such-pleasure-(and)-pain-(I)-experienced,
evam-āyu-pariyanto,
such-(my)-age-limit [expired].
so tato cuto
he, (from) that-state, passed-away,
amutra udapādiṃ [uppādiṃ (sī.)];
there, (re)-arose.
tatrāpāsiṃ
There too
evaṃ-nāmo evaṃ-gotto
(I had) such-(a)-name, such-(a)-clan,
evaṃ-vaṇṇo evam-āhāro
such-(an)-appearance, such-(was my)-food,
evaṃ-sukha-dukkhap-paṭisaṃvedī
such-pleasure-(and)-pain-(I)-experienced,
evam-āyu-pariyanto,
such-(my)-age-limit [expired].
so tato cuto
he, (from) that-state, passed-away,
idhū-(u)papanno’ti.
here, (re)-arose
Iti sākāraṃ sa-uddesaṃ
thus (with its) characteristics (and) details
aneka-vihitaṃ pubbe-nivāsaṃ
many-instances (of) previous-abodes-[lives]
anus-sarati,
(he) recollects,


Comments

  1. Sadhu!
    This reminds me of a favorite sutta passage from the Chinese Agama:
    "[A meditator, if he has to,] should search out for the sensual pleasure in the past, and not the sensual pleasure of the future."
    The idea is that, upon recollecting past sensuality, its passing and "been-there-done-that" nature would be clear to the mind. And there's something about looking into the past that just saps the energy out of hunger drive, which is usually directed for that future--the not yet experienced, not yet savored.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex