Skip to main content

No piṭaka: How did this concept "Ti-piṭaka" (3 baskets) come about?



 In the early suttas, the Buddha only talks about Dhamma (teachings) and Vinaya (monastic code).
There is no Abhidhamma mentioned in the EBT (early buddhist teachings),
there is no tipitaka (3 baskets).

How did this concept "Ti-piṭaka" (3 baskets) come about?

Abhi-dhamma (systematic treatise/analysis of Buddha's Dhamma)  came 100 to 200 years after the Buddha.
Some of it is compatible with EBT (early buddhist teachings), 
some of it is not.
The LBT (late Buddhist teachings) Theravadins wanted to grant Abhidhamma the same status as the Buddha's original words,
so they created a pretty ridiculous origin story claiming Abhidhamma actually was spoken by the Buddha secretly and passed on secretly through only one disciple. 
And then they created the concept of  "Ti-piṭaka" (3 baskets),
putting Abhidhamma as the 3rd basket, along with Dhamma (the Buddha's actual words), and vinaya (monastic code). 

Do you accord a middle manager the same respect and status as the chief executive officer?

This is incredibly arrogant and  presumptuous don't you think? 
Making your own basket and putting it on the same hierarchical level as the Buddha himself?
Maybe that's why the LBT Theravadins had to create a ridiculous origin story that the Buddha himself actually spoke the Abhidhamma and secretly only taught it to his mother in the deva realms, and Sāriputta. 

But will the Real Abhidhamma please stand up?

Of the 18 early Buddhist schools, most of them had their own Abhidharma system,
and they differ radically from the Theravdin Abhidhamma,
along with their origin stories.
The other schools attribute (their version of) Abhidhamma as commentaries made by disciples of Sāriputta, not the Buddha himself. 

So ask yourself this: If the other 18 schools of early Buddhism had nearly identical version of the suttas and vinaya as Theravada, 
but radically different versions of Abhidhamma,
along with a different origin story for their Abhidhamma,
does it seem likely to you that Theravada Abhidhamma is the original words of the Buddha?

Conclusion

There is no "Ti-piṭaka" (3 baskets) in EBT (early buddhist teachings).
There is just Dhamma and Vinaya.
Everything else is a mixed bag, use at your own risk.
You should follow the Buddha's advice in the 4 great references.

    AN 4.180 - AN 4.180 Mahāpadesa: The Four Great References
        AN 4.180.1 - (if you hear and memorize Dhamma from one who heard Buddha)
            AN 4.180.1.1 - (⛔if memory conflicts with suttas and vinaya, you must reject your memory as corrupted Dhamma)
            AN 4.180.1.2 - (✅☸if memory agrees with suttas and vinaya, your memory of Dhamma is confirmed)











Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lucid24.org: What's new?

Link to lucid24.org home page :    4👑☸   Remember, you may have to click the refresh button on your web browser navigation bar at to get updated website. 2025 12-16 2025-12 December: Major update on look and feel of Lucid24.org 2024 9-17 Lots of new stuff in the last 2 and a half years.  Too many to list. Main one justifying new blog entry, is redesign of home page. Before, it was designed to please me, super dense with everything in one master control panel. I've redesigned it to be friendly to newbies and everyone really. Clear structure, more use of space.  At someone's request, I added a lucid24.org google site search at top of home page. 2022 4-14 Major update to lucid24.org, easy navigation of suttas, quicklink: the ramifications 4-2 new feature lucid24.org sutta quick link 3-28 A new translation of SN 38.16, and first jhāna is a lot easier than you think 🔗📝notes related to Jhāna force and J.A.S.I. effect AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111: How does Ajahn Brahm an...

AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111: How does Ajahn Brahm and Sujato's "Jhāna" work here?

What these 3 suttas have in common, AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111, is the very interesting feature of explicitly describing doing vipassana, while one is in the jhāna and the first 3 formless attainments. LBT (late buddhist text) apologists, as well as Sujato, Brahm, claim that the suttas describe a jhāna where one enters a disembodied, frozen state, where vipassana is impossible until one emerges from that 'jhāna'.  Since Sujato translated all the suttas, let's take a look at what he translated, and how it supports his interpretation of 'jhāna'.  AN 9.36: Jhānasutta—Bhikkhu Sujato (suttacentral.net) ‘The first absorption is a basis for ending the defilements.’ ‘Paṭhamampāhaṁ,   bhikkhave,   jhānaṁ   nissāya   āsavānaṁ   khayaṁ   vadāmī’ti,   iti   kho   panetaṁ   vuttaṁ. That’s what I said, but why did I say it? Kiñcetaṁ   paṭicca   vuttaṁ? Take a mendicant who, q uite secluded from sensual pleasures, secluded from unskill...

Pāḷi and Sanskrit definition of Viveka

  'Viveka', Sanskrit dictionary Primary meaning is ‘discrimination’. Other meanings:  (1) true knowledge,  (2) discretion,  (3) right judgement,  (4) the faculty of distinguishing and classifying things according to their real properties’. Wikipedia (sanskrit dictionary entry 'viveka') Viveka (Sanskrit: विवेक, romanized: viveka) is a Sanskrit and Pali term translated into English as discernment or discrimination.[1] According to Rao and Paranjpe, viveka can be explained more fully as: Sense of discrimination; wisdom; discrimination between the real and the unreal, between the self and the non-self, between the permanent and the impermanent; discriminative inquiry; right intuitive discrimination; ever present discrimination between the transient and the permanent.[2]: 348  The Vivekachudamani is an eighth-century Sanskrit poem in dialogue form that addresses the development of viveka. Within the Vedanta tradition, there is also a concept of vichara which is one t...