Skip to main content

stories of jhanic force: taiji expert vs. speeding car

 

This story is about my friend and one of my taiji teachers. I'll call him Roy.

He was a senior disciple in a famous Taiji lineage.


The story takes place downtown  in a big city in the USA. Bad traffic, crowded streets, aggressive drivers and aggressive pedestrians.


Roy and his friend were riding their bikes downtown, maybe biking 5mph, not biking that fast.


A car driving probably over the speed limit for that downtown neighborhood, hit my friend Roy.

Roy's bike was seriously damaged, and Roy's whole body collided with the windshield of the car.


Roy's friend came over to check on him, very concerned and frightened.

Roy got up, was fine, not a scratch, not a bruise, no blood,  no pain, mind perfectly clear as if nothing had happened.


They looked over at the car.

The windshield was shattered!

Roy's friend exclaimed, "Whoah! Roy you fucked up that car!"


taiji expert vs. speeding car

taiji expert wins.


Naturally, I questioned my friend Roy about all the details of what he did in his meditation and taiji practice. Here are the key things that stand out.


At the time of the accident, Roy had maybe 4-5 years of taiji practice under his belt.

He did some Tibetan Buddhist meditation, not clear exactly what, but probably something 1st jhana with some intervals of  2nd jhana level of quality, based on my assessment of his taiji skill at the time.

But that not much daily meditation, 30-60min. at most.

He was doing probably at least 2-4 hours per day of taiji quan a day, and by how open his energy channels were, his hands getting red and puffy is a great sign of that.

For that level of taiji skill,  it's high quality relaxation (equivalent to passadhi sambojjhanga awakening factor). 

And another big factor was, for a period of at least a couple of years, he was very celibate, didn't have a girl friend, hadn't met his wife yet, and his views on masturbation was that it's a waste of time and energy and didn't do that. It's either sex with girl friend, or celibate.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex