Skip to main content

The jhān-o-meter: why should you use the force? because it's tangible proof of passadhi sambojjhanga

 


This article is part of a series:

🔗📝 notes on passadhi (pacification) and force

http://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2021/10/notes-on-passadhi-pacification-and-force.html








Wouldn't it be nice if jhana was so easy to ascertain as the health bar meters on a video game? 

Do you have enough piti, enough sukha, enough ekaggata to qualify as jhana? 

Is it too much piti, too much vitakka and vicara to disqualify you from first jhana? 

Piti drops in in 3rd jhana, sukha drops out in 4th, so how do you really know if you're in 2nd, 3rd, 4th when there's a subtle sensation of pleasant comfort but it pervades every cell in your body?


I'm going to let you in on a secret. 


Use the force. 

I'm playing with words referring to a popular modern mythical epic story, but what I'm referring to is as  tangible as a mosquito biting you, the difference in force sensation in your body between holding a 5lb weight, 4lb weight, etc. The force difference between wearing a winter coat and not wearing one, the difference in force and pressure you can feel between wearing a tshirt and jeans versus walking around completely naked. The difference between internal force have having a full bladder and needing to pee, and what the force feels like after you pee. That's the force you're using, the force you should learn to become sensitive to, and the sensitivity training that's described in steps 3 and 4 of the 16 steps of breath meditation. 

All 4 jhanas have passadhi-sambojjhanga, and 'the force' is directly proportional to passadhi. 


Passaddhi, pacification, is deep relaxation. When the taiji grandmaster tells the student, "you're not relaxed", and the student objects, "I AM relaxed!",  what the teacher really means is the student does not have jhanic level of relaxation. If you're relaxed (passadhi) in the jhanic sense, you will feel the force. Not an abstract intellectual concept, but a tangible, physical force that drives a current of energy in the body. When you have blockages, what I call jhana constipation, the body will shake when the force pushes the current of energy, and the energy rebounds off the blockage. When all the blockages are cleared, then the force drives the current and flows freely. In first and second jhana, this will feel hydraulic, like heat and water flowing everywhere. In 3rd jhana, the current feels like a dam filled up and saturated, and you no longer have the sensation of a fire hydrant hose vibrating and flowing inside, but you still feel force pushing on the parts of your body, usually the extremities like the skin, fingers, toes, where the energy channels are the slowest to completely open up. 


Conclusion: If you have genuine passadhi (pacification, relaxation), you will feel a tangible force

If you have genuine passadhi (pacification, relaxation), you will feel a tangible force pushing a current of energy (can be heat, fluid, electricity, or just visible light that gets brighter as your jhana battery is more fully charged).

If you don't feel the force, you're not as relaxed as you think, or you are in the jhana impotence state.

Even in jhana constipation state, you feel force pushing a current against your blockages. In jhana impotence state, this means you've expended too much of your PIE (precious internal energy) from too much indulgence in sensual pleasures (or even too much virtuous heavy thinking and studying of Dharma which is energy intensive). 

So the only way to end the jhana impotence state, is to keep noble silence and pure celibacy (even strong thoughts of lust can drain vast amounts of internal energy, for example reading/watching emotionally charged lust inducing romantic epic stories). 




This article is part of a series:

🔗📝 notes on passadhi (pacification) and force

http://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2021/10/notes-on-passadhi-pacification-and-force.html





Comments

  1. This matches with my experiences as well. Thank you

    ReplyDelete
  2. Definitely feel that energy loss due to thinking and mental focus... In this information age it's hard to avoid though, especially having to sift through so many different views. Gotta figure out and block out what is not essential.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex