Skip to main content

New translations for MN 70 and MN 95: Restores the lost connection to jhāna and upekkha in the Buddha's 12 step program

 My new translations for MN 70 and MN 95 are based on Sujato's. 

Sujato (and other translators) had been translating vitakka, upekkha, nij-jhāna, in a muddled way so all three of those terms sounded synonymous (considering,  reflecting, contemplating). I think sometimes Sujato even accidentally reversed the 'contemplating' and 'considering', basically treating vitakka as equivalent to 'nij-jhāna'. 

In my comprehensive survey in the nikāyas on the term ni-j-jhāna  I discovered that in many contexts, it is for all intents and purposes equivalent to the four jhānas. 

In my new translations for MN 70 and MN 95, I render vitakka, upekkha, nij-jhāna consistently and uniformly with my translations of the equivalent terms from the four jhāna formula.

 in these two suttas  upaparikkhati  [upa + pari + √ikkh + a + ti] is equivalent to upekkha (upa + ikkhati)

The prefix 'pari' means 'around', or circumspect, thoroughly. Just as pari-vitakka is just a chattier more thorough version of vitakka in first jhāna, upaparikkhati  is just a more thorough version of upekkha.


MN 95 is especially valuable in showing the difference between 

    diṭṭhi ni-j-jhāna khanti: meditating on a view, then accepting it as true.
    dhammā ni-j-jhānaṃ khamanti: meditating on Dharma, then accepting it as true. See MN 70 and MN 95.

Since you see both terms in the same sutta where jhāna associated with 'view' is unreliable, and the jhāna operating on Dharma after using upekkha on it are obviously saying this is third jhāna or better (upekkha doesn't appear in 4 jhāna formula until third, and vitakka is limited to first jhāna). 

the 'view' version of nij-jhāna, is associated with vitakka,

while the 'dharma' version of nij-jhāna, is associated with upekkha, (and in other suttas, wisdom, knowing and seeing)




4👑☸ → EBpedia📚 → ni-j-jhāna    



ni-j-jhāna: jhāna means meditation, so does ni-j-jhāna.

✅ jhāna means 'meditation' with singular focus. ni-j-jhāna is nearly synonymous. See SN 22.95.
⛔ nijjhāna does not mean 'gazing'. Gazing with the eyes is a superficial aspect that may or may not accompany nijjhāna.
⛔ nijjhāna is not (restricted to) 'thinking' or 'worrying'. In some contexts it may include that, but as SN 22.95 shows, nijjhāna can also be equivalent to 4 jhānas, a-vitakka a-vicāra samādhi, which is samādhi with subverbal mental processing without lingustic thought.

    diṭṭhi ni-j-jhāna khanti: meditating on a view, then accepting it as true.
    dhammā ni-j-jhānaṃ khamanti: meditating on Dharma, then accepting it as true. See MN 70 and MN 95.



MN 70




MN 95



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex