Skip to main content

🔗📝 collection of notes on 'nāga'

 

Most general definition of 'nāga' = 'giant'

AN 6.43 gives a great gloss of 'nāga'. It can be a 'giant' elephant, 'giant' serpent, 'giant' man, even a 'giant' tree.

🔗📝 collection of notes on AN 6.43 and KN Thag 15.2, a great gloss of 'Nāga', doing jhāna in all 4 postures




'nāga' can also be the Buddha, or any arahant

See AN 6.43 again, where the Buddha adds to the definition of  'nāga' by including people who are 'giants' in the sense of virtue and spiritual attainment.


'nāga' is a real, living breathing dragon, not a 'mythological' serpent

Why do pāḷi dictionaries always say a nāga/dragon is 'mythological'?
The suttas talk about dragons as real animals, not imaginary myth. Such as SN 46.1
SN 46.1 - 🔗🔊 Himavanta: Himalayas: STED 7sb formula with a beautiful simile of mighty dragon descending from himalayas

Not to mention the existence of crocodiles, dinosaurs, some of which flew, in prehistoric times, and the fact that the oceans contain way more volume than all the land mass we've explored, and we know for sure there are all kinds of unidentified animal life forms down there in the unexplored depths.

Is the Buddha mythological too just because you never met one? Is the Arahant mythological? Are expert meditators (of all religions) who've seen dragons delusional or mythological? 

There are 12 zodiac signs and the order goes like this: Rat, Ox, Tiger, Rabbit, Dragon, Snake, Horse, Goat, Monkey, Rooster, Dog and Pig. Each animal has its own unique characteristics. Interestingly, the Chinese Zodiac came about when the Jade Emperor wanted to select 12 animals to be his guards



In the Vinaya, it stipulates shape shifting dragons are not allowed to ordain as Bhikkhu monk

https://www.budsas.org/ebud/ebsut020.htm
... Once a Naga, a powerful serpent who can take the form of a human being, was mistakenly ordained as a monk. Shortly after, when asleep in his hut, the naga returned to the shape of a huge snake. The monk who shared the hut was somewhat alarmed when he woke up to see a great snake sleeping next to him! The Lord Buddha summoned the naga and told him he may not remain as a monk, at which the utterly disconsolate snake began to weep. The snake was given the Five Precepts as the means to attaining a human existence in his next life when he can then be a monk. Then out of compassion for the sad snake, the Lord Buddha said that from then on all candidates for the monkhood be called 'Naga' as a consolation. They are still called 'Naga' to this day.   


pāḷi dictionary should be based on pāḷi suttas, not modern man's prejudice and ignorance

If nothing else, the pāḷi dictionaries are based on the pāḷi suttas , and if the suttas and vinaya bhikkhu rules treat dragons as real, then the dictionary should as well.



Forum discussion

JamesTheGiant wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 11:56 amSo dragons are real? Talking, flying, magical-powered shape-changing dragons that we read about in the suttas?
And not in some other realm, but actually on our Earth about 2500 years ago.


There's a strange discrimination against nāga (dragon) that isn't there for other not easily verifiable things in the suttas.
Are the heaven of the 4 great kings mythological?
Heaven of 33?
Brahma?
Māra?
Any devas and ghosts?

Brahma, many other deva realms can change their appearance at will, taking on humanoid, animal form.
Why is it hard to believe nāgas (who are supposed to have excellent samādhi and psychic power) can do so as well?

The vinaya has a rule preventing a dragon (who temporarily took human form) from ordaining as a bhikkhu.
Is that a myth too?




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha
Post a Comment
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a
Post a Comment
Read more

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex
Post a Comment
Read more