Skip to main content

KN Snp 5.6 Dhotaka: another sutta where 'viveka' doesn't make sense as 'seclusion', 'discernment' makes more sense

 


Sutta Nipāta 5.6
Dhotaka-māṇava-pucchā
5.6 The Questions of Dhotaka
“Pucchāmi taṁ bhagavā brūhi metaṁ,
“I ask you, Blessed One; please tell me this,”
(iccāyasmā dhotako)
said Venerable Dhotaka,
Vācābhikaṅkhāmi mahesi tuyhaṁ;
“I long for your voice, great hermit.
Tava sutvāna nigghosaṁ,
After hearing your message,
Sikkhe nibbānamattano”.
I shall train myself for nirvanaing.”
“Tenahātappaṁ karohi,
“Well then, be ardent, alert,”
(dhotakāti bhagavā)
replied the Buddha,
Idheva nipako sato;
“and rememberful right here.
Ito sutvāna nigghosaṁ,
After hearing this message, go on
Sikkhe nibbānamattano”.
and train yourself for nirvanaing.”
“Passāmahaṁ deva-manussaloke,
“I see in the world of gods and humans
Akiñcanaṁ brāhmaṇamiriyamānaṁ;
a brahmin travelling with nothing.
Taṁ taṁ namassāmi samantacakkhu,
Therefore I bow to you, all-seer:
Pamuñca maṁ sakka kathaṅkathāhi”.
release me, Sakyan, from my doubts.”
“Nāhaṁ sahissāmi pamocanāya,
“I am not able to release anyone
Kathaṅkathiṁ dhotaka kañci loke;
in the world who has doubts, Dhotaka.
Dhammañca seṭṭhaṁ abhijānamāno,
But when you understand the best of Dharmas,
Evaṁ tuvaṁ oghamimaṁ taresi”.
you shall cross this flood.”
“Anusāsa brahme karuṇāyamāno,
“Teach me, brahmin, out of compassion,
Viveka-dhammaṁ yamahaṁ vijaññaṁ;
the dharma of seclusion so that I may understand.
Yathāhaṁ ākāsova abyāpajjamāno,
I wish to practice right here, peaceful, independent,
Idheva santo asito careyyaṁ”.
as unimpeded as space.”
“Kittayissāmi te santiṁ,
“I shall extol that peace for you,”
(dhotakāti bhagavā)
replied the Buddha,
Diṭṭhe dhamme anītihaṁ;
“that is apparent in the present, not relying on tradition.
Yaṁ viditvā sato caraṁ,
Having understood it, one who lives rememberfully
Tare loke visattikaṁ”.
may cross over clinging in the world.”
“Tañcāhaṁ abhinandāmi,
“And I rejoice, great hermit,
mahesi santimuttamaṁ;
in that supreme peace,
Yaṁ viditvā sato caraṁ,
having understood which, one who lives rememberfully
tare loke visattikaṁ”.
may cross over clinging in the world.”
“Yaṁ kiñci sampajānāsi,
Once you have understood that everything,”
(dhotakāti bhagavā)
replied the Buddha,
Uddhaṁ adho tiriyañcāpi majjhe;
“you are aware of in the world—
Etaṁ viditvā saṅgoti loke,
above, below, all round, between—
Bhavābhavāya mākāsi taṇhan”ti.
is a snare, don’t crave for life after life.”
Dhotaka-māṇava-pucchā pañcamī.


frankk:

'seclusion' doesn't lead to that understanding.

'discernment' leads to that understandig.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex