Skip to main content

viveka not just 'seclusion', but 'judicious seclusion': SN 16.4, MN 4, AN 8.30

 

Re: Aloneness

Post by frank k » 

mjaviem wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 5:33 am
frank k wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 2:48 amCould you guys show sutta reference numbers preferably, or pali sutta titles when you post quotes?
Looking at sutta translations without pali, is like reading news articles that won't name sources or go through editors and vetting process.
...
SN 16.4: Buddha asks mahā kassapa why he continues practicing difficult austerities, he replies for "aloneness":
viveka (judicous-seclusion) - commonly misunderstood as 'seclusion', the Buddha's definition of viveka is not just 'seclusion'. It means one has right view and discernment that led them to seclusion. Compared to for example, a unabomber terrorist, or any of a number of reasons why one would choose seclusion.
asaṃsaggassa (aloofness) - this is the opposite of someone who likes to gather and associate with people

MN 4: eka-t-ta (alone). eka = one, single. This is probably the word you're looking for when you want the English 'alone'.
Where viveka comes up, it's in the process of Buddha using right view and discernment to weed out the hindrance and launch the 7 awakening factors and four jhanas.
So again, 'viveka' was not just 'seclusion', it was 'judicious-seclusion' or discriminative separation arrived at from right view. It wasn't the seclusion of someone who loves sensual pleasures but was just temporarily sick of it and wanted a short vacation "secluded" from them, but really just wants to return to sensual pleasures after a break.

AN 8.30 eight great thoughts of first jhāna
Here viveka again shows discernment, not just seclusion.
the viveka is shown as supporting action for nekhhamma (renunciation), the first aspect of right resolve that is the opposite of kāma (lust, sensual pleasures).


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha
Post a Comment
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a
Post a Comment
Read more

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex
Post a Comment
Read more