Skip to main content

Ajahn Brahmali wrote: Freedom from sensual pleasure means freedom from the five senses... (to rationalize disembodied "jhāna")

from this discussion on suttacentral
(https://discourse.suttacentral.net/t/if-jhana-is-total-absorption-without-physical-sensation-why-is-pain-only-abandoned-in-the-fourth-jhana/29410/135)

Ajhan Brahmali wrote:
Freedom from sensual pleasure means freedom from the five senses.
These things are given up together.

replied in a different forum

...
However, if freedom from sensuality came from giving up the senses, then a blind, deaf, etc. person would be liberated.

Also, Ajahn Chah taught

In appanasamadhi the mind calms down and is stilled to a level of samadhi
where it is at its most subtle and skilful. Even if you experience sense
impingement from the outside, such as sounds and physical sensations,
it remains external and is unable to disturb the mind. You might hear a
sound, but it won’t distract your concentration.

(https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/thai/chah/the_teachings_of_ajahn_chah_web.pdf, p. 454)

And Bhante Gunaratana writes, of first jhana:

You do not totally lose all sensation, but the physical senses are off in the background
(Beyond Mindfulness in Plain English, p. 105)

and

When you enter the first jhana you are still in touch with your physical senses. Your eyes are closed but you can still hear, smell, feel, and taste.
(Beyond Mindfulness in Plain English, p. 121)



Frankk comments




level 2

lucid24-frankk·


...

Another way to interpret Ajahn Brahmali's "Freedom from sensual pleasure means freedom from the five senses. These things are given up together."

Is that by entering a disembodied state, one must necessarily be free of sensual pleasures.

We can very easily find two examples to falsify that.

1. Someone in sleep paralysis, feels great fear of being disconnected from the body, and a great DESIRE to reconnect with their body.


2. An arahant is permanently free of desire for sensual pleasures, so at the moment they became an arahant, they become disembodied and their physical body just slowly dies off since "these things are given up together, sensual desire and the embodied state."



Conclusion

Ajhan Brahmali wrote:
Freedom from sensual pleasure means freedom from the five senses.
These things are given up together.


He really said that. It's astounding.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha
Post a Comment
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a
Post a Comment
Read more

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex
Post a Comment
Read more