Skip to main content

first 3 jhānas and simile of a beach, a post of mine from 2017 comes up as first google search for "vitakka and vicara in first jhana"

 

frankk post on suttacentral forum Aug 2017

https://discourse.suttacentral.net/t/the-role-of-vitakka-and-vicara-in-the-1st-jhana/6232/3


@alaber wrote: 

This is the first time I found someone telling when the jhana one kneading is supposed to be done:

 i.e. while in jhana one, not before entering jhana one as I was thinking.


@Frankk response:

This is probably due largely to the influence of Vism.  in the west.

 They redefined V&V (from directed thinking and evaluation to mind glued to a visual image), redefined kāya (from anatomical body to body of only mental aggregates), 

 redefined sukha vedana in the jhānas 

 (from primarily bodily pleasant feeling to pure mental pleasant feeling), 

 crippled S&S (sati & sampajano) from its natural range of activity, 

 and removed any meaningful distinction between rupa and arupa in Jhāna.

 When you redefine jhāna and all of it’s major components in this way, 

 it is a completely different animal.


Had Vism. not been so influential, I highly doubt Ajahn Brahm’s redefinition of jhāna would have caught on.

 But such is state of things right now, 

 that when people come across Ven. Thanissaro’s or Bhante Gunaratana’s explanation of Jhana that conforms to the EBT, 

 people are surprised and confused by how it doesn’t match the jhāna (redefinition) that they learned.



V&V means directed thinking and evaluation/pondering in the EBT.

 What makes it jhāna and not just plain S&S (mindfulness and alertness) 

 is that one has learned to relax the body and mind to the point 

 that the juice of pīti and sukha can surge through the body causing euphoric sensations and feelings.

 V&V is restricted to kusala thoughts, 

 and the thoughts not so frequent and intense as to prevent body and mind from completely relaxing and allowing the juice to surge. (MN 19)

 First jhana is like you’re at the beach, 

 edge of the water where you stay connected to the water, 

 but your entire body is not fully immersed in the water continuously.

 It’s like you continually go down and come right back up for air.


2nd jhana is like you stay under water but, 

near the surface so the piti sukha comes in waves of varying intensity in force, 

but the body feels continuously fully immersed in the pitisukha.


3rd jhana you dive deep enough under the ocean to where the water is very still and calm.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex