Visuddhi magga, Ajahn Brahm, breath meditation, and the simile of the cheating wife
Here's a poor fellow (or gal) who's trying to explain how Vism's "breath" meditation could actually be "breath" meditation if the meditation subject is actually a patch of visible light, and it isn't even possible in that state of VRJ to sense the body, let alone the breath in the body.
auto wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 4:58 am... And now to align with Sutta then the 'i am aware of breathing in' could denote the breath-perception. ...
And if you're in an arupa samadhi (Vism. redefinition of "jhana") where you have no perception of body and no perception of the physical breath, that can't denote breath perception.
You're like the guy whose wife is cheating on him, all of his friends know it and try to tell him, but he's still so convinced in the devotion of his wife he believes her lies and don't believe all of their objective and truthful testimony over hers, and won't bother to check the evidence even though it's so easy to do.
(Vism. and late Abhidhamma is your wife, in case you don't get the simile).
Another poor deluded blind faith follower of vism. said:
... You still not bringing anything substantial to the table. ... Good luck!
Um, open your eyes? The very first post I entered into the thread, containing these two detailed research articles describing how EBT jhana and Vism. redefinition of jhana are drastically different.
You actually want to talk about substance, then I'm listening. But if you're just going to keep burying your head in the sand along with all the other deluded blind faith followers who think Vism. Jhana and pali suttas are talking about the same jhana, don't waste our time.
https://www.dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.p ... 3#p580263 A detailed analysis of where Vism. and Ajahn Brahm diverge into their own meditation methods is done here: EBT Jhāna Vs. VRJ (V)isuddhi-magga (Re)-definition of (J)hana
Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna. I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas if you're serious about jhāna. (since monastics are already celibate by rule) If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas, celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha
This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a
To give more context, this is a public event, * everyone knows cameras are rolling * it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment 17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex
(V)isuddhi-magga (Re)-definition of (J)hana 
-jhana
Comments
Post a Comment