Skip to main content

MN 125 agama parallel MA 198 調御地經 has some fascinating details about first jhana not in MN 125, through elephant similes

MN 125 agama parallel MA 198 調御地經 has some fascinating details about first jhana not in MN 125, through elephant similes. 

This part 1 of the article.

Here is a link to part 2: 

MN 125 agama parallel MA 198 調御地經 comparison, part 2


MA 198 調御地經


(All of the hyperlinks above are the table of contents to that sutta you can click to to jump to the agama sutra with chinese side by side with English translation)

Two major differences between MN 125  and its parallel, 

as far as how vitakka and jhana are explored, is that

1. MA 198 has several more war elephant similes to fill in some nice detail on what vitakka is doing in first jhana, and right before.

2. MA 198 seems to link the resilience of the war elephant to distractive and life threatening sensory data with khanti (patient endurance) while in the four jhanas, from before first jhana all the way through fourth jhana. 

MN 125 links that quality of resilience to imperturbability  (anenja) of just the perfected 4th jhana that is about to realize the 3 higher knowledges culminating in arahantship. MA 198 doesn't mention the 3 higher knowledges, just sort of implies that the 4 jhanas is going to lead to nirvana. 

In summary, whereas MN 125 makes the whole sutta about the gradual training that briefly explains every major stage, up to the realizing of 3 higher knowledges, MA 198 sticks with the original theme asked at the beginning about "what is ekagga citta (mind with singular preoccupation)", which then briefly talks about sila, but then focuses and ends on the nature of the four jhanas with several more elephant similes than is in MN 198.

So basically, the result of my study shows that MN 198 has some partial parallels and connections that are lost in MN 125.

These are the parallels I discovered (not listed on suttacentral) in MN 198:

MA 198 seems to link the same war elephant with khanti during 4 jhanas, rather than anenja (imperturbability). MA 198 seems to incorporate AN 5.139AN 5.140AN 4.112 horse, AN 4.114AN 5.203 thoroughbred horse, whereas in MN 125 they're scattered between different nikayas, and the thematic connection is lost if you don't study and remember the different suttas. 

In  other words, MN 198 reads as an expanded sutta with more commentary on the two very important suttas  AN 5.139 and AN 5.113  (the only sutta entitled ‘sammā samādhi’ in the pali canon), which describe both the process of attaining four jhanas and the actual use of them. While one is abiding in the four jhanas and using it in live battle, one patiently endures (khanti), is resilient, imperturbable to sensory stimuli that are distracting and even life threatening.


Conclusion

MA 198 is an awesome sutra, with some illuminating details that aren't in MN 125. I spent about 8 hours just reading and poring over the details on what it says about satipatthana, jhana, vitakka, and noticed things most people will not.

Just as the 4 famous jhana similes of AN 5.28 (bathman making soap ball, lake fed by spring, lotus pond, man covered in white cloth) give extremely valuable details about jhana practice, the elephant similes in MN 198 (and not in MN 125) elucidate some nuances of vitakka and jhana practice.

I'll dive into some of the details in a follow up article in the future, and explain why B. Analayo draws all kind of wrong conclusions reading the same text (MN 198 that I arranged into Chinese + English is 99% his translation, I only changed a few key meditation terms).

Comments

  1. Hello Frank.
    How to reconciliate this sutta with SN 4.23?

    "Now at that time Venerable Godhika was staying on the slopes of Isigili at the Black Rock. Then Venerable Godhika, meditating diligent, keen, and resolute, experienced temporary freedom of heart. But then he fell away from that temporary freedom of heart. For a second … third … fourth … fifth … sixth time Godhika experienced temporary freedom of heart. But for a sixth time he fell away from it. For a seventh time Godhika, meditating diligent, keen, and resolute, experienced temporary freedom of heart.

    Then he thought, “I’ve fallen away from this temporary freedom of heart no less than six times. Why don’t I slit my wrists?”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The suicide in SN 22.87 for example, was due to the monk having debilitating pain in some kind of terminal health condition. In SN 4.23 The sutta doesn't explain in detail the reasons and motivation, so we can only guess. My guess is Godhika had a bad enough physical health condition (that would be the only reason for an arahant who can do ceto vimutti to not be able to do it) that perhaps there was also severe enough chronic pain to warrant suicide. That's just a guess. But even if there was no chronic pain, the point of that sutta is for an arahant it's blameless whether they choose to endure (khanti, khamo) the pain or not. So either way, not a contradiction with MN 125 and those related suttas on khanti.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex