Skip to main content

MN 19 and agama || MA 102 two sorts of thoughts in first jhāna, and out, even Abhidhamma does not contradict this, what are Sujato and Brahm 'thinking'?

 

● MN 19 - 🔗🔊 24m, Dve-dhā-vitakka: two-sorts-of-thinking

     MN 191 (divide thoughts into 2 groups, good and bad)
    MN 192 (how to handle 3 types of wrong thoughts)
        MN 192.10 (V&V quality of thinking “bends” mind into habit)
        MN 192.11 (simile of cowherd busy)
    MN 193 (how to handle 3 types of good thoughts)
        MN 193.1 (renunciation in opposition to kāma/lust)
        MN 193.1.3 (first jhāna blocked by tired body)
        MN 193.1.5 (code phrase for “attempt 4 jhānas”)
        MN 193.10 (reiteration: quality of V&V thinking “bends” mind into habit)
        MN 193.11 (simile of cowherd relaxed in jhāna)
    MN 194 (code phrase for successful entry into 4 jhānas)
    MN 195 (Buddhist redefinition of Brahmin 3 Vedas (te-vijja))
    MN 196 (simile: mara wants to kill deer, buddha wants to lead them to safety)


The two suttas are extremely simlilar, differences are minor.

MA 102 念: Two sorts of thinking (in first jhāna, and out)

MA 102 T 26.102 念 T i 589a11 MN 19
    MA 1021 (divide thoughts into 2 groups, good and bad)
        MA 1021.1 (bad: 3 counterparts of right resolve)
        MA 1022.11 (simile of cowherd keeping cows in line with stick)
        MA 1022.10 (V&V quality of thinking “bends” mind into habit)
    MA 1023 (how to handle 3 types of good thoughts)
        MA 1023.1.3 (first jhāna blocked by tired body)
    MA 1024.1 (This is first jhana, replacing standard STED formula)
        MA 1024.1.5 (Allow myself thoughts about Dharma)
        MA 1023.11 (simile of cowherd sitting with peaceful thought of just, “cow”)
        MA 1023.10 (reiteration: quality of V&V thinking “bends” mind into habit, this time good)
    MA 1024.2 (Skip to STED Second Jhana because Dhamma Vitakka above is first jhana!)
    MA 1025 (purified, imperturbable 4th jhana directed to realize nirvana)
    MA 1026 (simile of deer hunter)


comments

One interesting and notable difference is MA 102 omits first jhāna stanard formula, to emphasize that the previous section IS first jhāna.

This is similar to how EBT Theravada omits first jhāna from MN 125 and adds an extra satipaṭṭhāna section with the same 3 types of thoughts as MN 19.


● MN 125 - 🔗🔊 28m, Danta-bhūmi🐘: Tamed-level: 🔗📝

        Gradual training of monk using simile of training wild elephant. Highlights:
        MN 1251 - (prince J. doesn’t think that teaching can lead to ekagga citta)
        MN 1251.1 - (simile of well trained elephants)
        MN 1251.2 - (simile of standing on mountain seeing clearly)
        MN 1253.1.1 - (simile: new monk has 5kg desire ordains → elephant still desires pleasures of being wild in forest)
        MN 1253.9.1 - (simile: 4sp satipaṭṭhāna nonstop,to subdue thoughts of household and delight in Dharma thoughts → elephant tied to post to keep it from returning to forest, and grow to like men and fortress)
        MN 1253.10.1 - (simile: 4sp satipaṭṭhāna again without kama = first jhāna → elephant trained to like and follow commands for good war elephant)
        MN 1253.10.2 - (note grass, water, firewood is simile for first jhāna from AN 7.67 )
        MN 1253.11 - (skip 1st jhāna, go directly to 2nd jhāna, since the previous stage of satipaṭṭhāna was first jhāna!)
        MN 1253.11.1 - (simile: monk developing 2nd through 4th jhāna → elephant tied up so it can’t move while training to be imperturbable to simulated weapons and battle stress)
        MN 1255.1 - (simile: successful monk with imperturbable 4th jhāna withstands cold, heat, mosquitoes → elephant in live battle struck by spears, swords, arrows)


If you can think in satipaṭṭhāna ("mindfulness"), then you can think in first jhāna.

Even Abhidhamma vibhanga (book 2 of 7) does not contradict this.

It's hundreds of years later, with Vism., and then thousands of years later, with Brahm, Sujato, Analayo, where they contradict the suttas above and redefine vitakka and vicāra as "not thinking", instead "placing the mind and keeping it connected [to a breath nimitta or kasina]", in a disembodied frozen stupor.

As MN 125 shows, if you can think and have body awareness in satipaṭṭhāna ("mindfulness"), you can do that in first jhāna as well.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex