Skip to main content

AN 3.68 excerpt, illustration of important learning feature in oral tradition

The part I highlighted in yellow, that's the important two words to memorize, that un-wise-attention is the nutriment for delusion.

The 3 repetitions highlighted in green, is a common phrase that occurs often in the suttas, such as SN 46.2.

Now here's the magic part. 

If you recite it regularly everyday, as slow as necessary as to be able to  reflect on the meaning, it has the effect of giving you a positive brain wash. Training your mind to do the right things, and eventually making it into a habit. Once you train yourself to think "yoniso mansikaro" all the time.


memorizing the necessary parts: 

The rest of this sutta AN 3.68, is redundant with the content of  an important sutta you should already have memorized, SN 46.2 (substitute raga for kama-chanda and doso for byapada hindrances), so all you need to memorize is the excerpt in this post.

( delusion worst of the 3 a.m. )

‘rāgo kho, āvuso, appa-sāvajjo dandha-virāgī,
‘Greed, reverends, is mildly blameworthy, but slow to fade away.
doso mahā-sāvajjo khippa-virāgī,
Hate is very blameworthy, but quick to fade away.
moho mahā-sāvajjo dandha-virāgī’ti.
Delusion is very blameworthy, and slow to fade away.’
...


( moho ← A-yoniso manasi-kāro )

‘Ko panāvuso,
And if they ask:
hetu ko paccayo yena
‘What is the cause, what is the reason why
an-uppanno vā moho uppajjati
un-arisen delusion arises, (and)
uppanno vā moho bhiyyo-bhāvāya vepullāya
arisen delusion increases (and) grows.
saṃvattatī’ti?
(why does that) lead-to-this (result)?
‘“A-yoniso manasi-kāro”tissa vacanīyaṃ.
You should say: ‘un-wise attention.
Tassa a-yoniso manasi karoto
with un-wise attention
an-uppanno vā moho uppajjati
un-arisen delusion arises, (and)
uppanno vā moho bhiyyo-bhāvāya vepullāya
arisen delusion increases (and) grows.
saṃvattati.
(that) leads-to-this (result).
Ayaṃ kho, āvuso, hetu
This is the cause,
ayaṃ paccayo yena
this is the reason why
an-uppanno vā moho uppajjati
un-arisen delusion arises, (and)
uppanno vā moho bhiyyo-bhāvāya vepullāya
arisen delusion increases (and) grows.
saṃvattatī’ti.
(this is why that) lead-to-this (result).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex