Skip to main content

SN 40.1 impure jhāna is still jhāna, learner's jhāna. role of V&V

So many important sutta passages are very short, and we miss a great deal of meaning by not reading it carefully.

Here are 3 important points people don't notice about this sutta.

1. V&V💭 is guiding your meditation

1. (V&V💭) vitakka & vicāra, directed-thought & evaluation: look at what (V&V💭) are doing right at the beginning. It's playing the role of
(7sb → 1. 🐘 sati)
and
(7sb → 2. 💭🕵️ Dhamma-vicaya)
(7 awakening factors is the launch sequence to get you into samādhi)

This pattern happens frequently in the suttas, with (V&V💭) implicit from quoted text, for example, "what is meant by third jhāna?", and  not always explicitly stated as a 'vitakka' or 'pari-vitakka' as it is here.

This means that vitakka/thinking, as everyone knows from their experience in real life, plays an important role of guiding you and keeping you steady as you do it. Especially as you're learning a new skill, as Moggallana is doing here.

So not only is (V&V💭) important as kindling for jhāna, such as AN 8.30 and AN 6.10, it also plays a role in simply guiding you in what you're doing, or about to do in your meditation.


2. The impure jhāna is impure, but its still jhāna

2. the 4 jhānas in the EBT, can be and are interrupted by impurities from time to time, as SN 40 and many suttas in AN 9 clearly explain. Especially when one is learning. It's just like any skill in life, if you don't practice, your skill erodes. But here is the important point. Even the impure jhāna, the Buddha still calls it "jhāna". . That's the reason for the existence of 4ip (iddhipada) and the suttas on samādhi mastery. They encourage you to remove all the impurities.  The impure jhāna is impure, but its still jhāna

VRJ (Vism. Re-definition of Jhāna) and ABRJ (Ajahn Brahm Re-definition of Jhāna, same as VRJ   without abhidhamma theory) which describes a type of samādhi training system that is completely different, and their redefinition of what body and thinking means, contradicts the EBT and causes massive problems.


3. learn the code words synonymous to 4 jhānas

3. Note the code phrase for "do four jhānas". The Buddha doesn't always explicitly say what samādhi and which of the 4 jhānas, so you have to learn some of the key words that are snyonymous for 4 jhāna quality of samādhi.

(STED 1st Jhāna)

🚫💑 vivicc’eva kāmehi
🚫💑 Quite-withdrawn (from) sensuality,
🚫😠 vivicca a-kusalehi dhammehi
🚫😠 withdrawn (from) un-skillful Dhamma [teachings & qualities],
(V&V💭) sa-vitakkaṃ sa-vicāraṃ
(V&V💭) With-directed-thought, with-evaluation,
😁🙂 viveka-jaṃ pīti-sukhaṃ
😁🙂 withdrawal-born rapture-&pleasure,
🌘 paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ upasampajja viharati.
🌘 first Jhāna (he) enters, dwells.

(V&V💭 is remembering what he is supposed to do, now he does it)

Idaṃ vuccati paṭhamaṃ jhānan’ti.
This is called the first jhāna.’
So khvāhaṃ, āvuso,
And so,
🚫💑 vivicc’eva kāmehi
🚫💑 Quite-withdrawn (from) sensuality,
🚫😠 vivicca a-kusalehi dhammehi
🚫😠 withdrawn (from) un-skillful Dhamma [teachings & qualities],
(V&V💭) sa-vitakkaṃ sa-vicāraṃ
(V&V💭) With-directed-thought, with-evaluation,
😁🙂 viveka-jaṃ pīti-sukhaṃ
😁🙂 withdrawal-born rapture-&pleasure,
🌘 paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ
🌘 first Jhāna
upasampajja viharāmi.
I was entering and dwelling in.

(impure jhāna: interrupted by impure perceptions)

Tassa mayhaṃ, āvuso, iminā vihārena viharato
Friends, while I dwelt in the dwelling [of jhāna samādhi]
Kāma-sahagatā saññā-mana-sikārā samudācaranti.
Sensual-pleasure-*** perceptions-and-attention [to those impure perceptions] assailed me.

(Buddha comes over via psychic power to give advice)

Atha kho maṃ, āvuso, bhagavā iddhiyā upasaṅkamitvā etadavoca:
Then the Buddha came up to me with his psychic power and said:
‘moggallāna, moggallāna.
‘Moggallāna, Moggallāna!
Mā, brāhmaṇa, paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ pamādo,
Brahmin, do not neglect the first jhāna!

(code phrase that means “do four jhānas”: saṇṭhapehi, ekodiṃ, samādhi)

paṭhame jhāne cittaṃ saṇṭhapehi,
(in) first jhāna, (the) mind (you should) settle,
paṭhame jhāne cittaṃ ekodiṃ karohi,
(in) first jhāna, (the) mind (you should) make-it-singular,
paṭhame jhāne cittaṃ samādahā’ti.
(in) first jhāna, (the) mind (you should) undistractify-&-lucidify,
So khvāhaṃ, āvuso, aparena samayena vivicceva kāmehi vivicca akusalehi dhammehi savitakkaṃ savicāraṃ vivekajaṃ pītisukhaṃ paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ upasampajja vihāsiṃ.
And so, after some time … I entered and remained in the first jhāna.
Yañhi taṃ, āvuso, sammā vadamāno vadeyya:
So if anyone should be rightly called
‘satthārānuggahito sāvako mahābhiññataṃ patto’ti, mamaṃ taṃ sammā vadamāno vadeyya:
a disciple who attained to great direct knowledge with help from the Teacher, it’s me.”
‘satthārānuggahito sāvako mahābhiññataṃ patto’”ti.



Comments

  1. In developmental psychology, we know that very small children often learn how to perform a chore by repeating the verbal instruction they have received from their parents. They would repeat verbatim what they were told, even imitating the voice and mannerism in which that instruction was first given. To master a chore is a performative act, guided by a narrative, which serves as a guideline and a reminder. In the same way, novice meditators place themselves in a routine, guided by the dhamma lessons they have internalized, enunciated to themselves in the form of skillful vitakka and vicara. The psychic voice of the Buddha or awakened devas who speak to meditators, in a way, are metaphorical embodiments of the remembered Dhamma lessons, of one's conscience and the inner teacher that one has groomed over the course of practice. Vitakka and vicara in this understanding, play an indispensable and fundamental role in what is widely known in pedagogy, and also underscore why it is so important to be a "well-learned" disciple in the Buddhist context. A "well-learned" noble disciple is one who knows the lessons by rote, in their full breadth and scope, and has learned to instruct himself internally via vitakka and vicara.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi William, I'm wondering if you could provide some sources on children performing chores by repeating verbal instructions? This is really interesting to me.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex