Skip to main content

hierarchy of perception, thinking, proliferation (in and outside of jhāna)

First, note that suttas clustered together sequentially often develop a theme that runs through them, so if you were to only read one of the cluster in isolation, you'd miss some important ideas.

MN 19, MN 20, deal with first and second jhana as the primary focus.
MN 18 has some important foundation groundwork that establishes a hierarchy on where thinking (vitakka) fits in, from the most raw sensory data, through proliferation of obsessive complex thinking and building a story and identity around that.

Cakkhu + rūpe + viññāṇaṃ → phasso → vedeti (vedanā) → sañjānāti → vitakketi → papañceti
eye + forms + consciousness → contact → feel → perceive → think → proliferate


* So consciousness (viññāṇaṃ) is the most raw sensory data.
* From 12ps (dependent co-origination) we know 6 sense bases (which include physical body) come before contact (phassa).
* experienced-sensation (feeling, vedana) builds on top of consciousness (viññāṇaṃ) and adds more information including physical body. Vedana is usually classified as 3 types: pain, pleasure, neither-pain-nor-pleasure.
* perception (sañña) builds on top of vedana.
* thinking (vitakka) builds on a diversity of perception (sañña) .
* proliferation (papanca) builds on obsessive thinking


example 1: you see a person you recognize and know to be a liar

* consciousness (viññāṇaṃ): raw sensory data of external forms you see with the eye. colors, shape, etc.
*  experienced-sensation (feeling, vedana): on initial contact, before perception kicks in, memory kicks in, perhaps vedana is primarily a neutral feeling. Later, after recognizing what you see is a person, not an inanimate object, and a person you know, etc, then perhaps you would experience painful feelings of anger, disgust, etc. While the suttas usually work with 3 types of feelings, sometimes vedana, vedeti, pati-samvedeti, and even with viññāṇa seems to talk about a type of understanding/wisdom/knowing/experiencing that is more complex than raw sensory data.
*  perception (sañña): Perception builds on what the vedana "sensed/experienced/felt". So we have perceptions that what we see is a person, a person we know, a liar.
* thinking (vitakka): Here's where the expression  vaci-sankhara (thoughts we think before we vocalize them) helps distinguish between perceptions and thinking. The liar perceived by sañña is an instantaneous non-verbal knowing. Vitakka builds on that perception by verbalizing it, with mental labels, imagery, words, usually in the form of communicable speech. "That's lying liar is a bad person who tells lies."
* proliferation (papanca): proliferation builds on the thinking by adding much more thinking and building an identity and narrative around that. "That lying liar has lied to me in the past, probably plans to tell a lie to trick me into doing something I don't want to do. But I'm not going to fall for his lie this time."



AN 4.41 samādhi-bhāvanā-sutta


Recall, the third and fourth jhana explicitly references sati and sampajano.
And in this sutta AN 4.41, #3 S&S is describing what one can and should do in third jhana, when not in #1 "pleasant abiding mode" to recharge one's energy.

Katamā ca, bhikkhave, samādhi-bhāvanā bhāvitā bahulīkatā
{and} what, *********, concentration-development, when developed (and) pursued,
Sati-sampajañ-ñāya saṃvattati?
(to) mindfulness-(and)-clear-comprehension (it) leads?
Idha, bhikkhave, bhikkhuno
Here, monks, a-monk:
viditā vedanā uppajjanti,
known (are) feelings (as they) arise,
viditā upaṭṭhahanti,
known (as they are) attended-upon,
viditā abbhatthaṃ gacchanti.
known (as they) go to} disappear.
viditā saññā uppajjanti,
known (are) perceptions (as they) arise,
viditā upaṭṭhahanti,
known (as they are) attended-upon,
viditā abbhatthaṃ gacchanti.
known (as they) go to} disappear.
viditā vitakkā uppajjanti,
known (are) thoughts (as they) arise,
viditā upaṭṭhahanti,
known (as they are) attended-upon,
viditā abbhatthaṃ gacchanti.
known (as they) go to} disappear.
Ayaṃ, bhikkhave, samādhi-bhāvanā bhāvitā bahulīkatā
This, *********, concentration-development, when developed (and) pursued,
Sati-sampajañ-ñāya saṃvattati.
mindfulness-(and)-clear-comprehension (it) leads-to.


As with MN 18, you see the same hierarchy, from more raw sensory data to the more complex versions with added stuff. Each level of the hierarchy is a higher level of abstraction.



MN 78 samaṇa-muṇḍika (the contemplative named mundika)




Again, MN 78,  like MN 19, MN 20, MN 125, intimately and in detail explaining what's going inside the four jhānas, follows the same hierarchy feeling -> perceptions -> thinking (vitakka and sankappa)


Ime ca, thapati, kusalā saṅkappā kiṃsamuṭṭhānā? Samuṭṭhānampi nesaṃ vuttaṃ. ‘Saññāsamuṭṭhānā’tissa vacanīyaṃ. Katamā saññā? Saññāpi hi bahū anekavidhā nānappakārakā. Nekkhammasaññā, abyāpādasaññā, avihiṃsāsaññā—itosamuṭṭhānā kusalā saṅkappā.
And where do these skillful thoughts stem from? Where they stem from has been stated. You should say that they stem from perception. What perception? Perception takes many and diverse forms. Perceptions of renunciation, love, and kindness—skillful thoughts stem from this.




SN 40 Moggallāna Saṃyutta



These suttas deal with the impurities that arise when one is learning the jhanas.
Guess what form they arise in? 
You got it, perceptions.
For the first jhana, the impurities that interrupt and break one out of first jhana, come in the form of perceptions of sensuality. 

For the second jhana,
So khvāhaṃ, āvuso, vitakkavicārānaṃ vūpasamā ajjhattaṃ sampasādanaṃ cetaso ekodibhāvaṃ avitakkaṃ avicāraṃ samādhijaṃ pītisukhaṃ dutiyaṃ jhānaṃ upasampajja viharāmi.
And so … I was entering and remaining in the second jhāna.
Tassa mayhaṃ, āvuso, iminā vihārena viharato vitakkasahagatā saññāmanasikārā samudācaranti.
While I was in that meditation, perceptions and attentions accompanied by directing-thought beset me.

Having thought (vitakka) would interrupt and break you out of second jhana, but the underlying perceptions, the non-verbal perceptions bubbling underneath the thought, can still happen and not break you out of second jhana, and even the higher jhanas.

Besides SN 40, there are a few other suttas dealing with impure jhanas with the same idea, and again, perceptions are lower on the hierarchy than thought (vitakka).
http://lucid24.org/sted/8aam/8samadhi/impure-jhana.html


conclusion

There is no basis, no evidence in the EBT, for Ajahn Brahm, B. Sujato, B. Analayo claiming that there's a special kind of  V&V just for first jhana.

V&V is the same before, during, and after first jhana.
thinking & evaluation.

They're wrong and they know it. That's why they avoid talking about the EBT suttas I've audited above that provide incontrovertible evidence against their false claims, and they can't provide any evidence in support of it.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex