Skip to main content

abhijjhā domanassaṃ, like kamehi and akusala dhammehi of first jhana, are short hand for "5 hindrances"



Re: abhijjhādomanassaṃ

Post by frank k » 

I doubt if very specific nuances for those two words are meant. It's probably meant to be a concise way to represent a broad spectrum of defilements.
Those two words frequently appear in samadhi context, such as in right effort guarding teh sense doors, and the famous 4sp satipatthana formula. Early Abhidhamma glosses those two words as representing the 5 hindrances. In this case, I agee with Abhidhamma.
So what the 4sp formula is actually saying with those two words, is that correct practice of 4sp puts you right in the doorway of first jhana.

In first jhana formula's viviceva kamehi .. akusalehi, early abhidhamma and sensible reading of EBT also say those are representing 5 hindrances.
Recall that samma sati (4sp satipatthana) in the 8aam noble eightfold path comes right before first jhana of samma samadhi.

So first jhana and correct practice of 4sp samma sati is talking about the same moment of meditation. The difference is the awakening factor of passadhi/pacification. If you got passaddhi, then sukha follows like a shadow and you're in jhana. If you don't have passadhi, then you're at the doorway of first jhana (got the mental side of things correct - just need to learn how to deeply relax the body).


auto wrote: 
Sat Jun 13, 2020 6:28 am
abhijjhā
domanassa
https://suttacentral.net/mn118/en/sujato wrote:That’s why at that time a mendicant is meditating by observing an aspect of the body—keen, aware, and mindful, rid of desire and aversion for the world.Tasmātiha, bhikkhave, kāye kāyānupassī tasmiṃ samaye bhikkhu viharati ātāpī sampajāno satimā vineyya loke abhijjhādomanassaṃ. (1)
domanassa here translated as aversion. I think any word what presents humiliating feeling is better.
abhijjhā as desire. I think there is word which relates to loathing.

idea is that the loathing is caused by desire to humiliate to literally make someone to give up or renounce.

Comments

  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Frank regarding this term , I found something interesting in the Nettippakarana, first quoting the Pali : ' tasmātiha tvaṃ bhikkhu kāye kāyānupassī viharāhi ātāpī sampajāno satimā vineyya loke abhijjhādomanassaṃ. “ātāpī”ti vīriyindriyaṃ, “sampajāno”ti paññindriyaṃ, “satimā”ti satindriyaṃ, “vineyya loke abhijjhādomanassa”nti samādhindriyaṃ, evaṃ kāye kāyānupassino viharato cattāro satipaṭṭhānā bhāvanāpāripūriṃ gacchanti. kena kāraṇena, ekalakkhaṇattā catunnaṃ indriyānaṃ.'

    This is the translation from Bhikkhu Nanamoli's Nettipakarana :
    (§174).
    [83] Now 'ardent' means the energy faculty, 'aware' the under-
    standing faculty, 'mindful' the mindfulness faculty, and 'guiding
    out covetousness and grief about the world' the concentration
    faculty (§174).
    So when someone abides contemplating the body as a body, the
    four foundations of mindfulness come to fulfilment through keeping
    in being. For what reason ? Because of the four faculties' state
    of single characteristic (§174).
    The guiding out covetousness and grief is referred to as the Concentration faculty.
    This is from SN 48.10 :
    And what is the faculty of concentration? There is the case where a monk, a disciple of the noble ones, making it his object to let go, attains concentration, attains singleness of mind. Quite withdrawn from sensuality, withdrawn from unskillful mental qualities, he enters & remains in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born from withdrawal, accompanied by directed thought & evaluation. With the stilling of directed thoughts & evaluations, he enters & remains in the second jhana: rapture & pleasure born of composure, unification of awareness free from directed thought & evaluation — internal assurance. With the fading of rapture, he remains equanimous, mindful, & alert, and senses pleasure with the body. He enters & remains in the third jhana, of which the Noble Ones declare, 'Equanimous & mindful, he has a pleasant abiding.' With the abandoning of pleasure & pain — as with the earlier disappearance of elation & distress — he enters & remains in the fourth jhana: purity of equanimity & mindfulness, neither pleasure nor pain. This is called the faculty of concentration.'
    So basically Satipatthana and jhana practice are not differentiated here.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha...

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a...

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex...