Skip to main content

SN 36.11 M.Olds critiques B. Sujato's translation of vitakka and vicara in 4 jhanas and 9 samadhi attainments

SN 36.11 M.Olds critiques B. Sujato's translation of vitakka and vicara in 4 jhanas and 9 samadhi attainments

excerpt from his blog: 
 http://buddhadust.net/dhammatalk/dhammatalk_forum/whats.new.htm#O.6.04.20


Oblog: [O.6.04.20] Thursday, June 04, 2020 5:50 AM

Three sensations are spoken of by the Sammā SamBuddha:
[1] pleasant sensation,
[2] painful sensation,
[3] not-painful-but-not-pleasant sensation.

But then this was also said by the Sammā SamBuddha:

"Whatsoever is experienced, that is simply pain."

Before you look at the sutta, see if you can reconcile the two statements.

 

 

[SN 4.36.11] Being Alone, The M. Olds, translation.
Linked to the Pali, the Warren translation, the Woodward translation, the Nyanaponika Thera translation, the Bhikkhu Thanissaro translation and the Bhikkhu Bodhi translation.
The Buddha explains in detail the meaning of the statement that all that which is experienced is joined with pain.

Here is a sutta which speaks of a gradual, step-wise progression to Arahantship focused on the gradual reduction and final elimination of own-making (sankhāra). It also shows that all four jhānas and the arupa attainments are possible to get in a partial (reduced) state and temporarily.

Seeing this I was curious as to how Bhk. Sujato handled his translation of vitakka and vicara ("placing of the mind and keeping it connected") which is not a thing particularly suited to being done partially (in a reduced form) or to being pacified.

I continue to wonder why one would go to all the trouble of placing the mind in the first jhāna and then having to get rid of it again for the second jhāna. Such a back-and-forth is not a characteristic of Gotama's style (he prefers "round and round").

Further, a characteristic that is Gotama's style is the explanation of terms he uses when doubt is possible: nowhere in the suttas is there an explanation of why what is in every other context clearly properly translated "thinking and pondering" (or some such idea related to thinking) is suddenly to be understood in a completely different way just for the jhānas.

I also wonder what happened to the thinking and wandering thoughts that one had while still engaged in the unskillful, just prior to entering the first jhāna.

Bhk. Sujato is an intelligent man, he is aware that he is wrong here but stubbornly refuses to admit he can make a mistake. He does not see that he is playing a role that supports a (probably brahmin) conspiracy or Buddhaghosa's ignorance (hardly likely when we learn that he burned the originals of the commentaries he was "copying" — Buddhaghosuppatti, Pali Text Society, Oxford, 2001, pg 7 and 29) which makes attaining the jhānas impossible (Ok, they say 1 in a million may attain the jhānas, whereas in the suttas the jhānas are to be attained 'easily and without trouble' by ordinary folk including laymen).

Bhk. Sujato also is maintaining a hypocritical stance in that while he advocates following only the Early Buddhist Texts, in this case he is following commentary only. There is no sutta support for his position.

There is another inconsistancy in Bhk. Sujato's translation here of sankhāra as "conditions" where he has elsewhere vigorously defended his translation as 'choices'. It is clear why he has changed his translation here; 'choices' just simply does not work.

Does he think nobody is watching? That there is no consequence for misrepresenting what the Buddha taught? Especially in such a way as to preclude the attaining of Sammā Samādhi (which he also insists is a prerequisite to attainment of Arahantship).

I have provided the Bhk. Sujato translation for those who would like to check this out for themselves.

(end of M. Olds article)



Related: 



SN 36.11, MN 44 B. Sujato, as of august 2019 still refuses to correct his misinterpretation and mistranslation of vitakka & vicara

https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2019/08/sn-3611-mn-44-b-sujato-as-of-august.html


SN 36.11 Buddha goes out of his way to emphasize physicality of 4 jhanas, 🌊 passaddhi/pacification

https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2019/04/sn-3611-buddha-goes-out-of-his-way-to.html


SN 36.11 speaking in first jhāna, acccording to B.Analayo is 'impossible'

https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2019/03/sn-3611-speaking-in-first-jhana.html



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha
Post a Comment
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a
Post a Comment
Read more

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex
Post a Comment
Read more