Skip to main content

SN 36.11 Buddha goes out of his way to emphasize physicality of 4 jhanas, šŸŒŠ passaddhi/pacification


SN 36.11 rahogata (complete, no peyyāla)


excerpt:

Chay-imā, bhikkhu, passaddhiyo.
(there are) six-of-these ****** pacifications.

(in 4 jhānas one can perceive rÅ«pa ✅ šŸš¶)

1. paį¹­hamaį¹ƒ jhānaį¹ƒ samāpannassa
1. (with) first jhāna attained,
šŸš«šŸ—£️šŸ’¬ vācā paį¹­ip-passaddhā hoti.
šŸš«šŸ—£️šŸ’¬ vocalization-of-speech is pacified.
2. dutiyaį¹ƒ jhānaį¹ƒ samāpannassa
2. (with) second jhāna attained,
šŸš«(V&VšŸ’­) Vitakka-vicārā paį¹­ip-passaddhā honti.
šŸš«(V&VšŸ’­) directed-thought-&-evaluation is pacified.
3. tatiyaį¹ƒ jhānaį¹ƒ samāpannassa
3. (with) third jhāna attained,
šŸš«šŸ˜ pÄ«ti paį¹­ip-passaddhā hoti.
šŸš«šŸ˜ rapture is pacified.
4. catutthaį¹ƒ jhānaį¹ƒ samāpannassa
4. (with) fourth jhāna attained,
šŸš«šŸŒ¬️šŸ˜¤ Assāsa-passāsā paį¹­ip-passaddhā honti.
šŸš«šŸŒ¬️šŸ˜¤ in-breath-out-breath is pacified.

(in a-rÅ«pa / form-less attainments, body šŸš¶ perception disappears)

5. saƱƱāvedayitanirodhaį¹ƒ samāpannassa
5. (with) perception-&-feeling-cessation attained,
saƱƱā ca vedanā ca paį¹­ip-passaddhā honti.
perception & feeling are pacified.

(standard descriptions of arahant)


6. KhÄ«į¹‡-āsavassa bhikkhuno
6. (having) killed-the-asinine-inclinations, a monk’s
šŸš«šŸ’‘ rāgo paį¹­ip-passaddho hoti,
šŸš«šŸ’‘ passion is pacified,
šŸš«šŸ˜  doso paį¹­ip-passaddho hoti,
šŸš«šŸ˜  aversion is pacified,
šŸš«šŸ˜• moho paį¹­ip-passaddho hotÄ«”ti.
šŸš«šŸ˜• delusion is pacified.



Compared to Theravada, Chinese parallel does not have list of 6 passadhi

SA 474 ę­¢ęÆ: subsiding

If we compare the difference between the Theravada pali version, it looks like the Sarvastivada EBT schools didn't have a controversy and redefinition of 4 jhanas being non-physical, and there was no need to have the 6 passadhi list. It looks like the Theravada Suttanta Jedi (preventing corruption from late Theravada) inserted the 6 passadhi in the pali version of the sutta.


Early Abhidhamma, the kāya (body)-passaddhi is physical

They make a clear distinction that the sutta talks about physical body, whereas in Abhidhamma theory, they redefine it as "collection of mental aggregates". In other words, in early Abhidhamma period they still had integrity and honesty, giving full disclosure that they were making modifications to the Dhamma as the Buddha defined it. But by the time the chapter on Ab Vibhanga Jhana rolls around, the charade is over, they stop talking about the sutta version and only use the VRJ (vism. redefinition of jhana) version of kāya.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex