Skip to main content

These go to eleven: the significance of the number 11 in the EBT


* it's an oral tradition, you memorize everything important. You number things as a check to make sure you're not missing anything in a piece of memorized Dhamma.
* you have 10 fingers, a universal counting device
* Anguttara Nikaya goes to 11, not 12, not 10.
* The famous anatta-lakkhana sutta passage has 11 ways of examining 5uk. So the number 11 may have significance as indicating comprehensive coverage, of knowing something fully and completely with no omission and gap.
* STED 11ada: all the suttas matching aniccato dukkh... : This scheme also is numbered to 11. Like the above, it's closely associated with realization of arahantship. But unlike the above, which is comprehensive in scope of input objects to examine, this set of 11 is an expansion on anicca, dukkha, anatta.

11 comprehensive ways of examining 5uk

These 11 criteria seem to be comprehensive. Past, present, future, gross, subtle, etc. It seems to say there is no phenomena or experience that falls outside this. Interestingly, Mahayana comes along hundreds of years later, and part of their marketing campaign to show they're better than Hinayana, is to say the Hinayanists understanding of emptiness and notself is incomplete, that it doesn't include all dhammas. It's hard to fathom what they mean, and how these 11 ways don't cover everything.

SN 22.59 An-atta-lakkhaṇa-sutta

1. Form

yaṃ kiñci rūpaṃ
any such form,
atītā-(a)n-āgata-paccuppannaṃ
[whether] past, -not-arrived-yet, (or) -present;
ajjhattaṃ vā bahiddhā vā
internal or external **;
oḷārikaṃ vā sukhumaṃ vā
blatant or subtle **;
hīnaṃ vā paṇītaṃ vā
inferior or sublime;
yaṃ dūre santike vā,
whatever distant (or) near **:
sabbaṃ rūpaṃ:
every form [is to be realized as]:
‘n’etaṃ mama,
'this (is) {not} mine,
n'eso-'ham-asmi,
this I am {not},
na meso attā’ti
this (is) {not} {my} self.’
evametaṃ yathā-bhūtaṃ
Thus as-(it)-actually-is,
sammap-paññāya daṭṭhabbaṃ.
(with)-right-wisdom (one)-must-see-(it).
That same passage also appears in these suttas:


alagaddūpamasuttaṃ (MN 22.1), — sabbaṃ rūpaṃ ‘netaṃ mama,...
cūḷasaccakasuttaṃ (MN 35.1),
mahārāhulovādasuttaṃ (MN 62.1),
mahāpuṇṇamasuttaṃ (MN 109.1),

susimasuttaṃ (SN 12.70),
anusayasuttaṃ (SN 18.13),
apagatasuttaṃ (SN 18.14),
khandhasuttaṃ (SN 22.48),
soṇasuttaṃ (SN 22.49),
anattalakkhaṇasuttaṃ (SN 22.59),
rādhasuttaṃ (SN 22.71),
surādhasuttaṃ (SN 22.72),
khajjanīyasuttaṃ (SN 22.79),
puṇṇamasuttaṃ (SN 22.82),
rāhulasuttaṃ (SN 22.91),
dutiyarāhulasuttaṃ (SN 22.92),
kappasuttaṃ (SN 22.124),
dutiyakappasuttaṃ (SN 22.125),
navātasuttaṃ (SN 24.31),
adukkhamasukhīsuttaṃ (SN 24.32)


yodhājīvasuttaṃ (AN 3.134)
yodhājīvasuttaṃ (AN 4.181),
sāḷhasuttaṃ (AN 4.196),

KN Paṭis, 1. mahāvaggo, 1. ñāṇakathā, 5. sammasanañāṇaniddeso, para. 2 ⇒

yaṃ kiñci rūpaṃ atītānāgatapaccuppannaṃ ajjhattaṃ vā bahiddhā vā oḷārikaṃ vā sukhumaṃ vā hīnaṃ vā paṇītaṃ vā yaṃ dūre santike vā, sabbaṃ rūpaṃ aniccato vavattheti ekaṃ sammasanaṃ, dukkhato vavattheti ekaṃ sammasanaṃ, anattato vavattheti ekaṃ sammasanaṃ.

KN Paṭis, 1. mahāvaggo, 1. ñāṇakathā, 5. sammasanañāṇaniddeso, para. 3 ⇒

yā kāci vedanā . pe . yā kāci saññā. ye keci saṅkhārā. yaṃ kiñci viññāṇaṃ atītānāgatapaccuppannaṃ ajjhattaṃ vā bahiddhā vā oḷārikaṃ vā sukhumaṃ vā hīnaṃ vā paṇītaṃ vā yaṃ dūre santike vā, sabbaṃ viññāṇaṃ aniccato vavattheti ekaṃ sammasanaṃ, dukkhato vavattheti ekaṃ sammasanaṃ, anattato vavattheti ekaṃ sammasanaṃ.

KN Paṭis, 3. paññāvaggo, 1. mahāpaññākathā, 1. soḷasapaññāniddeso, para. 20 ⇒

7. javanapaññatāya saṃvattantīti katamā javanapaññā? yaṃ kiñci rūpaṃ atītānāgatapaccuppannaṃ ajjhattaṃ vā bahiddhā vā oḷārikaṃ vā sukhumaṃ vā hīnaṃ vā paṇītaṃ vā yaṃ dūre santike vā, sabbaṃ rūpaṃ aniccato khippaṃ javatīti — javanapaññā. dukkhato khippaṃ javatīti — javanapaññā. anattato khippaṃ javatīti — javanapaññā. yā kāci vedanā . pe . yā kāci saññā. ye keci saṅkhārā. yaṃ kiñci viññāṇaṃ atītānāgatapaccuppannaṃ ajjhattaṃ vā bahiddhā vā oḷārikaṃ vā sukhumaṃ vā hīnaṃ vā paṇītaṃ vā yaṃ dūre santike vā, sabbaṃ viññāṇaṃ aniccato khippaṃ javatīti — javanapaññā. dukkhato khippaṃ javatīti — javanapaññā. anattato khippaṃ javatīti — javanapaññā. cakkhu . pe . jarāmaraṇaṃ atītānāgatapaccuppannaṃ aniccato khippaṃ javatīti — javanapaññā. dukkhato khippaṃ javatīti — javanapaññā . anattato khippaṃ javatīti — javanapaññā.







Re: These go to eleven: the significance of the number 11 in the EBT

Post by Dhammanando » Sat Apr 27, 2019 1:23 am
MN 33

"... possessed of eleven qualities, [a bhikkhu] cannot become one to reach growth, increase and maturity in this Dhamma and Discipline."

references


http://lucid24.org/sted/index.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha
Post a Comment
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a
Post a Comment
Read more

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex
Post a Comment
Read more