Skip to main content

STED 8 vimokkha, SP-FLUENT frankk translation, also hello VRJ🐍 and Jabrama🤡-jhana

 part of a series: 🔗8 vimokkha: collection of research articles 


SP fluent means I spell out some of the implications from the terse formula, pulling in information from related suttas. The result, is a sutta that you could actually follow plain English meditation instructions and not be completely baffled by code language with inscrutable meaning. 

Also very fascinating to note that VRJ🐍 (V)isuddhi-magga (Re)-definition of (J)hana and Jabrama🤡-jhana would fall under the second liberation. In other words, if they wanted to, they could have legally fit their meditation system into the EBT, without redefining important basic words like "body" and "thinking", and destroying the coherence of jhana and the suttas in general. 

So the question you should be asking VRJ and Ajahn Brahm followers, if their redefinition of "jhana" is supposed to fall under vimokkha liberation #1, then what is internal rupa and external rupa exactly, and what is liberation #2 supposed to be, if  their "jhana" is already liberation #1? The only kind of answer you'll get from them is gibberish and incoherence, yet they'll stubbornly cling to it and insist it makes sense even though their redefinitions of rupa and kaya render not only the EBT suttas incoherent, but their own Abhidhamma as well!


STED 8 vimokkha, SP-FLUENT frankk translation

.
.

(translated by frankk‍‍, SP-FLUENT abridged)

There are eight liberations. What are they?

1) from a samadhi where the mind can perceive the 5 senses, the meditator sees form internally and externally, his own body and external objects.

This is the first liberation.

[the four jhanas fall under this first liberation, but most likely only the imperturbable version of 4th jhana with strong luminosity and ability to see internal body organs and their colors as in the 8 abhi-bh-āyatana.]

2) from a samadhi where the mind is no longer connected to the 5 senses of the body, the meditator can not see his own body and internal organs, but he can see external forms and their colors.

This is the second liberation.

[strictly speaking, the four jhanas are not included in the second liberation, since one is in a formless attainment where one can not perceive the body, but it’s by means of an imperturbable fourth jhana that one can attain this formless samadhi of the second liberation.]

3) They’re focused only on beauty [from doing the four brahma viharas, divine abidings].

[directing their minds and pervading in 8 directions as in the standard 4bv☮️ formula].

[According to SN 46.54 beauty refers only to metta, friendly kindness meditation, and not the three remaining brahmavihara divine abidings, which would occur within in the next 3 liberations. However, KN Ps 1.5 explains beauty as all four divine abidings under this third liberation. When in doubt, the more versatile interpretation is preferred. ]

[The other question is whether the brahma viharas can be done from four jhanas, or must be done for the third liberation from a formless samadhi. According to SN 46.54 the latter 3 brahma viharas are done while in formless attainments, and if we are to assume the 3rd liberation starts with the second liberation as prerequisite, then they would be correct. However, KN Ps 1.5 does not impose that restriction, so one could be doing 4bv from four jhanas, as described in AN 8.63 which is closely associated with AN 8.66, the definitive source on 8 vimokkha definition].

This is the third liberation.

4) Going totally beyond perceptions of form, with the ending of perceptions of impingement, not focusing on perceptions of diversity, aware that ‘space is infinite’, they enter and remain in the dimension of infinite space.

This is the fourth liberation.

5) Going totally beyond the dimension of infinite space, aware that ‘consciousness is infinite’, they enter and remain in the dimension of infinite consciousness.

This is the fifth liberation.

6) Going totally beyond the dimension of infinite consciousness, aware that ‘there is nothing at all’, they enter and remain in the dimension of nothingness.

This is the sixth liberation.

7) Going totally beyond the dimension of nothingness, they enter and remain in the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception.

This is the seventh liberation.

8) Going totally beyond the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception, they enter and remain in the cessation of perception and feeling.

This is the eighth liberation.

And that concludes the exposition of the eight liberations.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha...

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a...

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex...