Skip to main content

AN 4.41 what are the sati and sampajāno doing in four jhānas?




Bundokji wrote: Mon Oct 10, 2022 4:42 amFriends,

In AN 4.41, the Buddha taught:
"And what is the development of concentration that, when developed & pursued, leads to mindfulness & alertness? There is the case where feelings are known to the monk as they arise, known as they persist, known as they subside. Perceptions are known to him as they arise, known as they persist, known as they subside. Thoughts are known to him as they arise, known as they persist, known as they subside. This is the development of concentration that, when developed & pursued, leads to mindfulness & alertness.In your understanding, what validates the sequence of arising, persisting and subsiding in the quoted sutta?

In other words, what makes arising what it is, rather than being persisting or subsiding?

Thank you



Re: Concentration that when developed & pursued leads to mindfulness & alertness

Post by frank k » Thu Nov 17, 2022 4:26 am
It would help if you explain what's motivating your question.
real Example featuring all 3:
You're experiencing a stream of neutral sensations (a dukkham a sukham vedana), say for a few minutes.
You decide to enter jhāna.
You're thoughts meet the requirement of right resolve,
you deeply pacify/relax the body,
and over the next few seconds then you notice the neutral sensations end, and pleasurable (sukha vedana) arising.
You decide to see how long the sukha vedana persists in this jhāna session.
After an hour, you notice some pain sensation (dukkha vedana) in your knee.
There is sukha vedana in the rest of your body, but some dukkha vedana in the knee area.
You notice the different qualities of the sukha, for example the intensity of it varies in various parts of the body.
These are perceptions that arise, sustain, end (your perceptions of how the sukha differ in quality).
The type of mental fuel you use to sustain this jhāna (for example, using metta, or breath meditation), also gives you vitakka's for you to observe their rise, persisting, and falling away.

Remember, AN 4.41 all four of them are done within a 4 jhānas context.
sampājano is better translated as lucid-discerning, it corresponds with the pañña faculty, in verb form, it's pajānati. You know when your mind has greed or doesn't, you know when it's in samādhi or isn't, and you know when different vedana, sañña, vitakka are rising, persisting, falling.
You're not just 'alert' to them, you know them with the wisdom faculty, and you're not just 'situationally aware'.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex