Skip to main content

MLK jr., and the difference between Sujato's "love" and the Buddha's "metta"




Re: Kp 9, Snp 1.8: a new reading of the Mettasutta [from Sujato] 



mikenz66 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 03, 2022 2:37 pm

Hi Frank,

Clearly your understanding of the English is different from many of us. It would be more useful to discuss exactly what metta means, rather than criticising other people's English.









Post by frank k » Fri Nov 04, 2022 3:29 am
I'm not criticizing your English. I'm questioning your ability to discern when it's appropriate to use words with sloppy and ambiguous meaning, and when precision is required.
Metta can include some wholesome parts of Jesus's 'love', or MLK jr.'s 'love'.
but 'love' includes a whole lot of defilements which 'metta' does not.
So you can not just plug in 'love' everwhere the suttas have 'metta'.
By the way, MLK jr. was a serial cheater on his wife, who was loyal, devoted, and 'loving' towards MLK and gave him no reason to cheat.
So MLK was practicing sujato's 'love', but not the Buddha's 'metta'.

I'm going to spell it out because some of you will still not get it.

When MLK was fornicating the women who were not his wife, he was practicing Sujato's "love", but not "metta". 
He still exercised the Jesus type of compassionate love toward the women he was cheating with, as well as the lustful defiled "love", and he still "loved" his wife, but he wasn't doing "metta" toward his illicit lovers, and he wasn't doing "metta" toward his wife. 

So if MLK was going by Sujato's instructions on how to practice "love", he is not guilty of any wrong doing there, because if you go by Sujato's English translations on 'metta', it doesn't exclude lust, passion, extra marital affairs, etc. 

Whereas if you respect the Buddha's clear separation between friendliness, good will, and lust, passion, this kind of ambiguous interpretation would not be possible. 

This is why it's not acceptable for Sujato to translate 'metta' as 'love'.



www.lucid24.org/sted : ☸Lucid24.org STED definitions


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha
Post a Comment
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a
Post a Comment
Read more

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex
Post a Comment
Read more