Skip to main content

fun pali lesson: SN 8.4 ananda sutta on lust, prose and verse, audtip.org pali sutta release SN 8.4

Feed two birds with one scone. | Vegan animals, Vegan quotes ...

I'm going to feed two birds with one scone here:

1) Announcing a new pali sutta audio recording to add to our collection:
2) Fun pali lesson for the day, using the same sutta recording SN 8.4

2a) observe the difference in chanting style between the prose section at beginning, and the verse section (starts at around 1min mark).

I didn't read up on how it's officially done, I just listened to some of Ven. Jiv's pali recordings and reverse engineered what I think he's doing. And then my version is a simplified version of what I believe he's doing. My style tries to really minimize musicality, but without losing the tonal patterns that aid with memorization, and error detection. 

So for the prose section, it's just the way we normally chant suttas. I'll call it the baseline, and each phrase (arbitrary length of where we pause to catch our breath), the tone pitch tends to rise a little bit towards the middle, and then gradually drift back down towards the baseline.

For the verse section, I chant at a higher key/pitch than the prose verse baseline, and it stays relatively flat at that higher key. 
Each verse comes in couplets.
 For each odd numbered line (first line is odd), the verse baseline stays flat/constant all the way through.
For each even numbered line (second line is even), the verse baseline stays flat the first half of the phrase, but then the pitch drifts down. 
So that is done deliberately, so you can always tell if you're on an even or odd line, it differentiates lines within couplets, and that helps differentiates paragraphs.

If you haven't recited a sutta for a really long time, and then try to reconstruct parts you are forgetting or messing up, the verse meter, and the tonal patterns of chanting, are all really helpful to remembering the correct chanting.


Exercise for the pali student: 
Listen to the audio while reading the sutta text.
Notice the difference in style between prose and verse.

2b) observation about the prose/verse differentiation  in oral tradition.
If you read the prose section, you notice it doesn't really add anything of doctrinal substance, it just gives a setting and context showing Ven. Vangisa as the student of Ven. Ananda. 
* But in other suttas, the prose may really expand on the verse section and give some extensive commentary.
*  Or sometimes the verse just serves as a short summary of a long sutta. 
But if you think about how we learn, memorize, and transmit teachings via the oral tradition, most likely the verse is the only thing you memorize, and the prose is most likely the reciter's sponteanous, extemporaneous and customized for the audience commentary and explanation of what the verse means.

2c) should I memorize this sutta?
Remember, the pali gorilla fun primer series, I'm not going to suggest you memorize any new vocabulary or sutta passages unless they're critical. 
Now in my personal repertoire, I've memorized the verse and recite it regularly (only takes about 40 seconds), and didn't memorize the prose for SN 8.4 since it contains no doctrinal importance. Almost all of the words in the verse are worth learning and remembering, they come up often and are important. 

♦ “kฤma-rฤgena แธayhฤmi,
(with) sensuality-(and)-lust (I) burn,
cittaแนƒ me pari-แธayhati.
Mind (of) mine completely-burns.
♦ sฤdhu nibbฤpanaแนƒ brลซhi,
[the] thorough Nirvana-[fire extinguishing]-process, [please] explain,
anu-kampฤya gotamฤ”ti.
Out-of-compassion, Gotama.
(ฤnanda replies)
♦ “saรฑรฑฤya vipariyesฤ,
(your) perceptions (are) inverted,
cittaแนƒ te pari-แธayhati.
[so the] mind (of) yours completely-burns,
♦ nimittaแนƒ pari-vajjehi,
(the) sign (to) completely-avoid:
subhaแนƒ rฤg-ลซpasaแนƒhitaแนƒ.
beauty connected-with-lust
♦ “saแน…khฤre parato passa,
Co-doings; alien (they should be) seen (as),
dukkhato mฤ ca attato.
pain-&-suffering, not the self.
♦ nibbฤpehi mahฤ-rฤgaแนƒ,
Nirvanify [extinguish] (the) massive-lust,
mฤ แธayhittho punap-punaแนƒ.
don’t burn again-(and)-again.
♦ “a-subhฤya cittaแนƒ bhฤvehi,
Non-beautiful [perceptions] (the) mind develops,
ek’-aggaแนƒ su-samฤhitaแนƒ.
Singular-preoccupation, well-(developed)-undistractible-lucidity.
♦ sati kฤya-gatฤ ty-atthu,
remembrance (of) body-condition,
nibbidฤ-bahulo bha.
disenchantment-(in)-abundance ***.
♦ “a-nimittaรฑca bhฤvehi,
Sign-less [meditation] (you) develop,
mฤn-ฤnusaya-mujjaha.
conceit’s-tendency,-discard.
♦ tato mฤn-ฤbhisamayฤ,
thereupon (with) conceit-penetrated,
upasanto carissasฤซ”ti.
(in) peace (you) abide.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhฤna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhฤna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhฤna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhฤnas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhฤnas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhฤnas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex