Skip to main content

☸šŸ¦ fun pali pronunciation lesson: tapping with the fingers as a metronome to distinguish between long and short syllables.


audio for the lesson:

♦ buddhaį¹ƒ saraį¹‡aį¹ƒ gacchāmi.
(to the) Buddha (as a) refuge (I) go.

On the audio, when I recite this carefully select phrase, each finger tap on the table is equivalent to one long syllable in time.

Two short syllables = 1 long syllable in time. 
I selected this phrase because the number of short consecutive syllables are even (except for the 'i' in the last word gacchami). This is so the metronome tapping stays in sync.

The purpose of this exercise is to train you to get a feel of timing for 2 shorts = 1 long temporally. In practice, you don't have to get the timing perfect, but the more accurate you are, the more easily pali speakers can communicate with each other without ambiguity and confusion. Imagine during an arahant council and everyone is reciting the suttas they know in unison to verify the fidelity of transmission. You don't want to be the oddball out of sync that keeps interrupting the group chant. 

Breaking down the syllables word by word:
bud - long
dham - long
sa - short
ra - short
nam - long
gac - long
chā - long
mi - short

Remember the 4 simple rules of pronunciation? 
☸šŸ¦ pali pronunciation, quick and easy, 4 simple ...

In the phrase above, pronounce every letter you see.
Note that a long syllable does not have to contain a 'long' vowel.
The long 'ā' vowel has a bar on top of the 'a'.
The short 'a' vowel does not.
Similarly: 'Ä«' is long, 'i' is short vowel.
Similarly: 'Å«' is long, 'u' is short vowel.
The remaining two vowels are tricky: 'e' and 'o' are always long vowels, even though they have no bar on top of them. This is just a dumb rule we have to live with because the people who designed the romanized pali script decided that was the way it was going to be. Perhaps they thought saving ink on the printing presses from not having the extra bars on top of the 'o' and 'e' would save money? Who knows. 

So the basic of the 4 rules of pronunciation is, pronounce every letter you see, including the 'h', know the difference between long and short vowels, long and short syllables, treat multiple consonants like speed bumps, and listen to accurate pali audio to learn from.

My pronunciation is very competent on timing and fundamentals, but not up to par on the more subtle things that Americans have trouble discerning from native Indian or Sri Lankan vocals. Ideally use Ven. Jiv's audio samples whenever possible on lucid24.org. He's the gold standard. Other Sri Lankan bhikkhus and bhikkhunis are excellent, but sometimes they get a little carried away with musicality and it can be hard for a beginner to know what is being musical and what is the actual vowel supposed to sound like. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex