Skip to main content

🐍🐊🐦🐕🐺🐒 fun pali vocabulary words from SN 35.247 Chap-pāṇak-opama sutta

audio pali chanting here:
🔗🔊 Chap-pāṇak-opama: 6 animals simile
 
SN 35.247 sutta text


Pali word for 'simile' is 'upama'

Let's start with the sutta title:

upama: (in cpds.) like; similar; having the qualities of. ()

Upama (adj.) [compar. -- superl. formation fr. upa, cp. Lat. summus fr. *(s)ub -- mo] "coming quite or nearly up to" i. e. like, similar, equal D i.239 (andha -- veṇ˚); M i.432 (taruṇ˚ a young looking fellow); A iv.11 udak˚ puggala a man like water); Pv i.11 (khett˚ like a well cultivated field; = sadisa PvA 7); PvA 2, 8 etc. -- Note. ūpama metri causa see ū˚ and cp. opamma & upamā.; 


But because of sandhi rules, 
You might see 'upama' in compound words as opama or opamma.

Cha-p-pāṇak-opama =  6 animal similes

You probably also recognize "pāṇa" from breath meditation 'ana-pana-sati' (inhale-exhale-sati).
There's probably a relationship there, animals have to breathe after all.

'opama' and 'upama' occurs often in the suttas. Here in the 3rd vagga of Majjhima Nikaya, most of the suttas here are based on similes. Look at the sutta titles carefully. I've added hyphens, but in the wild on your own in the vicious pali jungle, they're not so easy to spot. 

✴️MN 21 Kakacū-pama: the saw-simile: (🤖 16m): (simile of expert chariot driver) (simile of removing weeds) (story of maid testing queen’s anger) (5 ways of criticizing) (simile of bucket collecting all of earth) (simile of painting the sky) (simile of torching ganges river) (simile of catskin bag) (simile of saw)
✴️MN 22 Alagaddū-pama: snake-simile: (🤖 25m): Seems to be the same Arittha of SN 54.6, since both cover the theme of sensual pleasure not being obstruction. “Is it really true, Reverend Ariṭṭha, that you have such a harmful misconception: ‘As I understand the Buddha’s teachings, the acts that he says are obstructions are not really obstructions for the one who performs them’?” “Absolutely, reverends...”.
✴️MN 23 Vammika: Ant hill: (🤖 6m): A deva gives a riddle to a monk: “Sir, what is the ant-hill? What is the fuming by night and flaming by day? Who is the brahmin, and who the sage? What are the sword, the digging, the bar, the bullfrog, the forked path, the box, the tortoise, the axe and block, and the piece of flesh? And what is the dragon?”
✴️MN 24 Rathavinīta: 7 relay chariots (🤖 9m): There don't seem to be any other EBT suttas that explain what these 7 stages are. It seems you have to read the non-canonical Vism. to find out the details.
✴️MN 25 Nivāpa: Fodder: (🤖 11m) simile of Mara as deer hunter trapping with 5kg: ‘When these deer intrude on where I cast the bait, they’ll recklessly enjoy eating it. They’ll become indulgent, then they’ll become negligent, and then they’ll be vulnerable on account of this bait.’ And indeed, the first herd of deer intruded on where the trapper cast the bait and recklessly enjoyed eating it. They became indulgent, then they became negligent, and then they were vulnerable to the trapper on account of that bait.
✴️MN 26 Ariya-pariyesanā [Pāsarāsi]: noble-search (🤖 33m): And what is the noble search? It’s when someone who is themselves liable to be reborn, understanding the drawbacks in being liable to be reborn, seeks the unborn supreme sanctuary, nirvana. Themselves liable to grow old, fall sick, die, sorrow, and become corrupted, understanding the drawbacks in these things, they seek the unaging, unailing, undying, sorrowless, uncorrupted supreme sanctuary, nirvana.
✴️MN 27 Cūḷa-hatthi­pad-opama: short footprint simile (🤖 19m): “Suppose that a skilled elephant tracker were to enter an elephant wood. There he’d see a large elephant’s footprint, long and broad. So niṭṭhaṃ gaccheyya: ‘This must be a big bull elephant.’
✴️MN 28 Mahā-hatthi-pad-opama: large footprint simile (🤖 17m) : (mostly going into detail on 4 elements) “The footprints of all creatures that walk can fit inside an elephant’s footprint, so an elephant’s footprint is said to be the biggest of them all. In the same way, all skillful qualities can be included in the four noble truths.
✴️MN 29 Mahā-sāropama: larger discourse heartwood simile (🤖 9m): When they’ve gone forth they generate possessions, honor, and popularity. They’re happy with that, and they’ve got all they wished for. And they glorify themselves and put others down because of that:
✴️MN 30 Cūḷa-sāropama: shorter discourse heartwood simile (🤖 11m): “Suppose there was a person in need of heartwood. And while wandering in search of heartwood he’d come across a large tree standing with heartwood. But, passing over the heartwood, softwood, bark, and shoots, he’d cut off the branches and leaves and depart imagining they were heartwood. If a person with good eyesight saw him they’d say: ‘This gentleman doesn’t know what heartwood, softwood, bark, shoots, or branches and leaves are.


Fun words from SN 35.247

Seyyathāpi, bhikkhave, puriso chappāṇake gahetvā nānāvisaye nānāgocare daḷhāya rajjuyā bandheyya.
Suppose a person was to catch six animals, with diverse territories and feeding grounds, and tie them up with a strong rope.
Ahiṃ gahetvā daḷhāya rajjuyā bandheyya.
🐍 They’d catch a snake,
Susumāraṃ gahetvā daḷhāya rajjuyā bandheyya.
🐊 a crocodile,
Pakkhiṃ gahetvā daḷhāya rajjuyā bandheyya.
🐦a bird,
Kukkuraṃ gahetvā daḷhāya rajjuyā bandheyya.
🐕 a dog,
Siṅgālaṃ gahetvā daḷhāya rajjuyā bandheyya.
🐺 a jackal,
Makkaṭaṃ gahetvā daḷhāya rajjuyā bandheyya.
🐒 and a monkey,

1. First look at this word that occurs so many times: bandheyya

bandha: bound; fetter; attachment; imprisonment. (m.)

Bandha (adj.) [cp. Vedic bandha, fr. bandh] 1. bond, fetter It 56 (abandho Mārassa, not a victim of M.) Nd1 328 (taṇhā˚, diṭṭhi˚); ThA 241. 

That word is almost a freebie. bound, bind, bandha look and sound very similar and probably have common roots.

2. 'kukkura' = dog. Probably that word is an onomatopoeia
the formation of a word from a sound associated with what is named (e.g. cuckoo, sizzle ).
Some dogs bark with sounds that sound like 'kukkura'. 

3. makkata = monkey: both words start with "m" and have "k" in the middle.

4. pakkhī: a bird; the winged one. (m.)
You might recognize that word from 
satta bodhi pakkhiya dhamma
Seven Buddha-fication wings (of) Dharma (7 sets with 37 factors)
B. Thanissaro has "wings to awakening". 

Or some translators prefer the much more boring "aids to enlightenment". 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex