Skip to main content

brahm'splaining jhāna, brahm·splain /ˈbräm splān/, brahmsplain, brahmsplanation

brahm·splain

/ˈbräm splān/
verb informal brahmsplain; 
3rd person present: brahmsplains; 
past tense: brahmsplained; 
past participle: brahmsplained; 
gerund or present participle: brahmsplaining;
noun: brahmsplanation;

    (of a supposed expert on Jhāna and/or Pāḷi) explain ('splain) how Jhāna works according to the suttas,
to someone (who oftentimes knows more about Jhāna, suttas, Vism., than the 'expert'),
in a condescending manner, with a baffling combination of overconfidence and cluelessness.


1.  "Sujato brahm'splained that the Buddha teased out a special esoteric meaning out of that word 'vitakka'  because he [the Buddha!] had an impoverished vocabulary and was forced to redefine it." 


2. "I asked a Pa Auk teacher what is ekaggata, 
what does it mean in first jhāna, 
and why does it redundantly have the same role as both vitakka and vicāra (gluing mind to nimitta), 
and how the heck does second jhāna even work if vitakka and vicāra drop out, 
yet ekaggata supposedly had the same role?  

They brahmsplained some mumbo jumbo. 
I can't even remember the confusing nonsensical string of words they said."

3. Ajahn Brahm claims 'kāmehi' of first jhāna is not sensual pleasures, 
but the 5 sensory faculties themselves. 
When asked to show what suttas show that ever being the case, 
since every occurrence in the suttas is always about sensual pleasures, 
he refers to the first jhāna formula use of 'kāmehi'.
This kind of brahmsplanation is circular reasoning, 
a fallacy so elementary even a young middle school student could spot it.
  

4. Followers of both Brahm and Vism. based heretical redefinitions of jhāna 
brahmsplain that even though the five factors of first jhāna are present and in full force,
it's not actually first jhāna "proper". 
(Vimuttimagga, canoncial Abhidhamma, and EBT suttas disagree, if jhāna factors are there, even for the time it takes to snap one's fingers, that's a moment of jhāna.
Vism. also corrupts the original definition of access (upacara) and fixed (appana) samādhi from Vimuttimagga.)

Kind of like saying even though the sperm is there, 
egg is there, 
the egg is fertilized, 
it's not pregnancy "proper", 
it's just that the factors of pregnancy are there.

Other examples

 Sujato, Brahm, Vism., etc., redefining jhāna's 

kāya as "body of mind",

vitakka as "not thinking",

rūpa as "not physical form, mental visual form",

is about as convincing as Ian (manager of Rock group 'Spinal Tap')

 'splaining that "appeal is becoming more selective."











Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha
Post a Comment
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a
Post a Comment
Read more

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex
Post a Comment
Read more