Skip to main content

Seinfeld jokes about jhāna, vitakka and vicāra

Seinfeld jokes about jhāna, vitakka and vicāra

I heard this joke from Seinfeld, I'm paraphrasing from memory:

What's with 'grape nuts' * ?
You pour it out of the box into a bowl,
there are no grapes,
and there are no nuts.

People can just redefine words into whatever they want now?
What's next?
'Shoes' are 'milk'.
You put socks on your feet,
and then you pour 'shoes' all over them.

* 'grape nuts' = the product name of an American breakfast dry cereal that you pour into a bowl, add milk, and eat.

pic for goldcraft
Seinfeld might as well have been joking about Visuddhimagga and Ajahn Brahm redefining jhāna.
What's with 'vitakka' and 'vicāra' * in first jhāna,
according to Ajahn Brahm and Visuddhimagga?

There's no thinking,
there's no evaluation,
nothing that resembles vacī-sankhāra,
linguistic labels or communicable speech.

You pour first jhāna into a bowl,
and there's no vitakka and vicāra to be found.

Just placing your mind and keeping it in a frozen stupor for a predetermined amount of time.

So monks can just redefine fundamental words with established meaning
into anything they want now?

What's next?
Redefining 'body' as
a 'body of mental factors completely devoid of a body?'⏹️




Comments

  1. BSRK AdityaMarch 22, 2021 at 9:39 AM

    > keeping it in a frozen stupor

    Please avoid using derogatory language, the practice is legitimate even if the words are to be rechosen.

    Incidentally, I myself practice by this methodology (and I have no other options, I cannot do your jhanas)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lucid24.org: What's new?

Link to lucid24.org home page :    4👑☸   Remember, you may have to click the refresh button on your web browser navigation bar at to get updated website. 2024 9-17 Lots of new stuff in the last 2 and a half years.  Too many to list. Main one justifying new blog entry, is redesign of home page. Before, it was designed to please me, super dense with everything in one master control panel. I've redesigned it to be friendly to newbies and everyone really. Clear structure, more use of space.  At someone's request, I added a lucid24.org google site search at top of home page. 2022 4-14 Major update to lucid24.org, easy navigation of suttas, quicklink: the ramifications 4-2 new feature lucid24.org sutta quick link 3-28 A new translation of SN 38.16, and first jhāna is a lot easier than you think 🔗📝notes related to Jhāna force and J.A.S.I. effect AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111: How does Ajahn Brahm and Sujato's "Jhāna" work here? 3-13 Added to EBPedia J.A.S.I. ('Jazzy...
3 comments
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a...
Post a Comment
Read more