Skip to main content

MLK jr., and the difference between Sujato's "love" and the Buddha's "metta"




Re: Kp 9, Snp 1.8: a new reading of the Mettasutta [from Sujato] 



mikenz66 wrote: Thu Nov 03, 2022 2:37 pm

Hi Frank,

Clearly your understanding of the English is different from many of us. It would be more useful to discuss exactly what metta means, rather than criticising other people's English.









Post by frank k » Fri Nov 04, 2022 3:29 am
I'm not criticizing your English. I'm questioning your ability to discern when it's appropriate to use words with sloppy and ambiguous meaning, and when precision is required.
Metta can include some wholesome parts of Jesus's 'love', or MLK jr.'s 'love'.
but 'love' includes a whole lot of defilements which 'metta' does not.
So you can not just plug in 'love' everwhere the suttas have 'metta'.
By the way, MLK jr. was a serial cheater on his wife, who was loyal, devoted, and 'loving' towards MLK and gave him no reason to cheat.
So MLK was practicing sujato's 'love', but not the Buddha's 'metta'.

I'm going to spell it out because some of you will still not get it.

When MLK was fornicating the women who were not his wife, he was practicing Sujato's "love", but not "metta". 
He still exercised the Jesus type of compassionate love toward the women he was cheating with, as well as the lustful defiled "love", and he still "loved" his wife, but he wasn't doing "metta" toward his illicit lovers, and he wasn't doing "metta" toward his wife. 

So if MLK was going by Sujato's instructions on how to practice "love", he is not guilty of any wrong doing there, because if you go by Sujato's English translations on 'metta', it doesn't exclude lust, passion, extra marital affairs, etc. 

Whereas if you respect the Buddha's clear separation between friendliness, good will, and lust, passion, this kind of ambiguous interpretation would not be possible. 

This is why it's not acceptable for Sujato to translate 'metta' as 'love'.



www.lucid24.org/sted : ☸Lucid24.org STED definitions


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lucid24.org: What's new?

Link to lucid24.org home page :    4👑☸   Remember, you may have to click the refresh button on your web browser navigation bar at to get updated website. 2026 1-30 Overhauled the DN, MN, SN menu pages - Supreme navigation January 30, 2026 2025 12-16 2025-12 December: Major update on look and feel of Lucid24.org 2024 9-17 Lots of new stuff in the last 2 and a half years.  Too many to list. Main one justifying new blog entry, is redesign of home page. Before, it was designed to please me, super dense with everything in one master control panel. I've redesigned it to be friendly to newbies and everyone really. Clear structure, more use of space.  At someone's request, I added a lucid24.org google site search at top of home page. 2022 4-14 Major update to lucid24.org, easy navigation of suttas, quicklink: the ramifications 4-2 new feature lucid24.org sutta quick link 3-28 A new translation of SN 38.16, and first jhāna is a lot easier than you think 🔗📝notes relat...

AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111: How does Ajahn Brahm and Sujato's "Jhāna" work here?

What these 3 suttas have in common, AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111, is the very interesting feature of explicitly describing doing vipassana, while one is in the jhāna and the first 3 formless attainments. LBT (late buddhist text) apologists, as well as Sujato, Brahm, claim that the suttas describe a jhāna where one enters a disembodied, frozen state, where vipassana is impossible until one emerges from that 'jhāna'.  Since Sujato translated all the suttas, let's take a look at what he translated, and how it supports his interpretation of 'jhāna'.  AN 9.36: Jhānasutta—Bhikkhu Sujato (suttacentral.net) ‘The first absorption is a basis for ending the defilements.’ ‘Paṭhamampāhaṁ,   bhikkhave,   jhānaṁ   nissāya   āsavānaṁ   khayaṁ   vadāmī’ti,   iti   kho   panetaṁ   vuttaṁ. That’s what I said, but why did I say it? Kiñcetaṁ   paṭicca   vuttaṁ? Take a mendicant who, q uite secluded from sensual pleasures, secluded from unskill...

My thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, and the solution

HHDL = His holiness, the Dalai Lama I've collected good references here, including the actual video, and snippets from forums discussions containing valid critcism and explanations of cultural context, and most importantly, what the rules of the actual vinaya that buddhist monks are supposed to follow: 1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue At the time of this writing, HHDL is about 88 years old. He has an exemplary record devoting his life to compassionate service to all living beings,  as a Tibetan Buddhist monk. In this age of 'me too',  everyone with a cell phone with high resolution cameras, and the ability to quickly publicize any indiscretion or sexual crime, we've seen sexual predators in positions of power being exposed and convicted. Leaders of large corporations,  governments, professional sports, doctors, leaders in all religions. Tibetan Buddhism has an especially poor track record with corrupt sexual predators. https://thewal...