"My brain literally exploded."
"My mind was literally blown."
I was taught these two definitions for "literal" and "figurative" in grade school,
explained nicely here by Miles N. Fowler,
Copy editor, coll. newspaper, Pi Delta Epsilon (Journalism)
People will get a word into their heads and use it more than they should,
to the point where they are misusing it.
I don’t know why, but why have so many people, for so long,
used the word “literally” incorrectly?
“A wasp came flying at me, and it was literally as big as a house!”
No, it was literally closer to one inch long,
but it might have seemed much bigger at close range.
(Fear causes the mind to exaggerate.)
The word “literally” should only be used to describe reality.
It does not mean that something is only found in poetry (literature).
It is never “literally raining cats and dogs.”
That would mean that furry creatures were actually falling from the sky.
The correct way of saying that would be,
“It is figuratively raining cats and dogs,”
as in, a “figure” of speech.
People do not overuse the word “figurative.”
Go figure.
Recently, I've heard several younger people using the word "literally" incorrectly
I thought, is the younger generation completely uneducated?
It only takes two seconds with phones and personal computers to look up a correct meaning of a word.
Why are their friends and social media followers not being a good friend and correcting them,
letting them know they look uneducated and foolish?
Just as people let their friends know if there's a piece of food stuck in their teeth and they look goofy?
Then I thought, maybe I'm "literally" the "insane" one
One of the things I've learned in life is never underestimate the stupidity of people.
So I took 2 seconds to do a quick internet search to see if the dictionary meaning for "literal" had changed.
Indeed it did!
summarized nicely in this excerpt from:
https://theweek.com/articles/466957/how-wrong-definition-literally-sneaked-into-dictionary
https://theweek.com/articles/466957/how-wrong-definition-literally-sneaked-into-dictionary
Much to the chagrin of grammar-lovers everywhere,
it turns out that this informal (and completely incorrect) use of "literally"
has actually been added to three established dictionaries,
as Reddit user andtheniansaid pointed out.
Here's what each dictionary said:
Merriam-Webster added a second usage of the word to mean "virtually,"
but added the disclaimer that
"Since some people take sense 2 to be the opposite of sense 1,
it has been frequently criticized as a misuse.
Instead, the use is pure hyperbole intended to gain emphasis,
but it often appears in contexts where no additional emphasis is necessary."
Cambridge Dictionaries Online added that the informal usage of the word is
"used to emphasize what you are saying,"
while Oxford Dictionaries also added a similar informal usage,
which is "used for emphasis while not being literally true."
Oxford, however, also noted that
"in recent years an extended use of literally has become very common,
where literally is used deliberately in non-literal contexts,
for added effect,
as in they bought the car and literally ran it into the ground.
This use can lead to unintentional humorous effects
and is not acceptable in formal contexts, although it is widespread."
So there you have it:
The dictionaries have begrudgingly bowed to the will of the grammar-averse public.
What's the proper Buddhist attitude to words changing in meaning?
Everything is impermanent,
language is constantly changing whether you like it or not.
So getting upset or angry about change is counterproductive, and bad for your health.
But from a purely pragamatic and common sense point of view,
not being pedantic or snobby intellectual elitist,
some important terms you don't want to mess with because it's dangerous.
They can literally cause great harm or at the very least
financial repercussions, waste of time, energy and resources
if people misunderstand your use of term "literally" to be literal (instead of the opposite meaning, "figurative").
For example, in this 8 second political advertisement,
If we take them literally, truthfully, at their word, that they were "literally shocked",
someone would call 911 and send an ambulance.
Do you literally know how expensive that is in time, money, resources?
Is that a politician you would elect?
(Don't answer that question, I don't want to know. If 71 million people elected a convicted felon as US President who's a known rapist, racist, misogynist lying liar only looking out for himself, not the good of the country, they're literally capable of electing anyone for any office)
You can literally use the word "literally" with the opposite meaning...
And the 3 major dictionaries have caved in to popular misuse and accept this opposite meaning.
But intelligent, sensible, pragmatic people
are still going to think you're literally an idiot if you do,
whether the context is formal or not.
Brain teaser
Are these uses of "literally" correct?
1) Intelligent people will think you're literally an idiot if you use the word "literal" to mean "figurative".
2) Intelligent people will literally think you're an idiot if you use the word "literal" to mean "figurative".
I use the definition for "idiot" in the general sense of "person of low intelligence" here,
not a clinical diagnosis for some medical condition.
3) people who say "literal" when they actually mean the opposite "figurative" are literally insane.
using this definition of "insane": extreme foolishness or irrationality.
What about changing meaning of important words in sutta translation?
Buddhists accept change with equanimity,
even if it's wrong or stupid,
but when it comes to important words in the suttas,
you have a draw a line.
Example 2: MN 117 Sujato's fraudulent/criminal interpretation of 'vitakka' is based on this sutta
Answer to brain teaser
All uses of "literally" there are correct.
Comments
Post a Comment