Sometimes, such as MN 152, equanimity, as an attitude, is the prominent characteristic we're focusing on. But to translate upekkha as 'equanimity' is hugely problematic. If you ordered a PBJ, a peanut butter and JELLY sandwich, and they gave you a peanut butter sandwich with no jelly, you would be pissed. As you should. You should be even more pissed when translators give you 'equanimity' when you ordered 'equanimous-observation'. It's the observation, the 'ikkhati' in upekkha, that does the vipassana that realizes nirvana. You ever wondered, looking at the 7 awakening factors, how the 7th one, "equanimity" could actually lead to nirvana? The answer is equanimty can not. Only equanimous-observation, can see the rise and fall of aggregates with the power of 3rd and 4th jhāna, see their true nature, and make the leap to nirvana. 'equanimity' does not observe/see (with right view, right discernment). If the 7th awakening factor...