Skip to main content

Chanting is not just a devotional group activity. It's an integral part of samādhi, the oral tradition, and life, if done correctly.

 




Chanting not just devotional group activity. 

It's an integral part of samādhi, the oral tradition, and life, if done correctly.

* first chant I ever memorized was fire sermon. i discovered a wonderful property about chanting Dhamma that's liberating, this is 'eminently useful', you can recite over and over repeatedly, I did it for hours of time without getting tired of it. 

I also discovered first hand, without having read the suttas such as 5.26 that describe how chanting, thinking about Dhamma, leads to rapture, joy, pleasure, samādhi. 

that's eminently useful, not just a nice idea from the suttas.

people treat Dhamma books and dhamma talks like disposable knowledge. you chew on it, enjoy its flavor, and then soon forget about it. Maybe pull it out of the pantry a few months later, chew on it and dispose of it again. But when you memorize it, recite it everyday, it impacts you much deeper and differently. As AN 7.67 says, memorized Dhamma become weapons on hand that you can use at will once you understand it, and remember it. Not vague fuzzily remember like people do with disposable book Dhamma and Dhamma talks, but Dhamma passages that you've memorized by heart, know inside and out, practice using it in your life all the time. So for most people, the Dhamma they vaguely and fuzzily remember is like Dhamma weapons that are locked up in a vault in a storage locker located a few miles away in a storage facility. If you even remember having the weapon and think about using it, you are slow to retrieve it from the vault, clumsily wield the weapon, and it's not very powerful. For a weapon to be lethal, you need to have it memorized, remembered (sati) constantly, sharpening the blade with jhāna and  practicing using the weapon with jhāna and satipaṭṭhāna.



Simile to help you determine if you're chanting correctly.




The Buddha sits on your right shoulder, 

Māra the evil one sits on your left shoulder. 

Both whisper advice in your ear all the time. 

Keep score.

Which adviser is winning, meaning which one do you listen to more often, and how badly is one side beating on the other?

If you're chanting correctly, 

what you chant all the time becomes your Dhamma weapon.

And the more skilled you are with the weapon, the more skilled, quicker and stronger you are overpowering māra everytime time he whispers bad advice to you.

The stronger you get over time, the more Māra becomes a weak whisper cowering on your shoulder knowing the beat down that's coming when he opens his mouth.

Pretty soon, Māra stands 20 feet away, doesn't even perch on your shoulder any more because he knows the pain that's coming if he's in striking distance of your Dhamma weapon. 

Eventually he just gives up on you and stays away completely.

That's how you know you're chanting correctly.

Whatever dhamma you say out loud, that's sammā vācā right speech.

Whatever dhamma you memorized, that's the 'sati' remembrance of Dhamma faculty.

Whatever dhamma you mentally recite in your mind, that's vitakka, directed thought.

But vitakka is only a coarser rough comprehension of the Dhamma you're chanting.

Vicāra, evaluation of the directed thought, you fully comprehend (intellectually) the meaning of the Dhamma passage you've memorized (sati) and recited or thought about. 

Upekkha = upa + ikkhati (looking upon) = Equanimous observation. 

Upekkha, is the samādhi powered version of Dhamma-vicaya (investigation) that accomplishes deep insight practice.

Vicāra falls under Dhamma-vicaya, and without jhāna power behind it, falls under intellectual understanding.

But when upekkha, equanimous-observation, is done with the samādhi of 3rd and 4th jhāna, now the Dhamma weapon you memorized, recited, has lethal potential, the ability to do some real harm to Māra and his army of evil minions. 

Vicāra understands and knows that lust is unskillful.

Upekkha, when one sees deeply from 4th jhāna, that lust is unskillful, the insight penetrates much deeper to affect your personality at a much deeper level. 

And the result is the defilment of lust is weakened proportionally to how strong your jhāna and upekkha are.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha...

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a...

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex...