Skip to main content

Ordination is a gamble? incurring karmic debt if one doesn't attain noble fruits

 

Re: Ordination is a gamble

Post by frank k » 

HappyBuddhist wrote: Mon Oct 02, 2023 5:25 pmJust throwing out some thoughts for discussion:

I've been contemplating about ordination, and it dawned on me that it's a gamble -

By being completely dependent on other people's generosity for basic living, a monk incurs karmic debt. If he doesn't attain noble fruits within this life time, this debt would mature in a future life time.

(If he does attain noble fruits, then this doesn't really matter, of course)

So maybe it's a safer option to practice as a layman.
Demerit and/or debts are commensurate with how sincere and diligent your practice is, not whether you attain noble fruits in this life time.
Don't underestimate the value of monastics who keep sila purely, are virtuous, but don't attian noble fruit in this life.
The merit from that is enormous.
Similar to seeing repeated advertisements on televison.
When you come into contact with virtuous, happy monastics, it's like an advertisement that encourages you to behave likewise.

Contrast that with contact with virtuous happy lay person.
It's similar, but there's much more added power when they're wearing the robes.

Another example.
Consider a mostly virtuous monastic who propogates a corrupted Dharma,
versus a layperson who propogates an uncorrupted Dharma, and blows the whistle on said monastics who corrupt Dhamma.
Assume they have the same number of years and decades of practice in the Dhamma.

Who has greater influence?
A well liked monastic wearing robes is going to automatically have much greater credibility over the layperson, even if their Dhamma is corrupted.
Just as people are going to look at a Phd degree or other credential and immediately believe they're more qualified than someone with only an undergraduate degree or high school diploma.



You're not seeing the real 'gamble'

Re: Ordination is a gamble

Post by frank k » 

If you (anyone considering ordinaton) are going to call it a 'gamble',
you're looking at it completely wrong.

If you're considering ordination with a good organization,
the real gamble and question you should be asking yourself, can you afford not to ordain?

If you ordain, and later find that the laylife is too hard to resist, you can always disrobe.

But if you don't ordain, when you maybe only had one good opportunity in this life to taste the pure, holy life,
to plant seeds and possibliy establish an irreversible path to nirvana,
and instead revolve in samsara for the next 100 lives missing this opportunity,
don't you think you would regret that?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lucid24.org: What's new?

Link to lucid24.org home page :    4👑☸   Remember, you may have to click the refresh button on your web browser navigation bar at to get updated website. 2024 9-17 Lots of new stuff in the last 2 and a half years.  Too many to list. Main one justifying new blog entry, is redesign of home page. Before, it was designed to please me, super dense with everything in one master control panel. I've redesigned it to be friendly to newbies and everyone really. Clear structure, more use of space.  At someone's request, I added a lucid24.org google site search at top of home page. 2022 4-14 Major update to lucid24.org, easy navigation of suttas, quicklink: the ramifications 4-2 new feature lucid24.org sutta quick link 3-28 A new translation of SN 38.16, and first jhāna is a lot easier than you think 🔗📝notes related to Jhāna force and J.A.S.I. effect AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111: How does Ajahn Brahm and Sujato's "Jhāna" work here? 3-13 Added to EBPedia J.A.S.I. ('Jazzy...

AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111: How does Ajahn Brahm and Sujato's "Jhāna" work here?

What these 3 suttas have in common, AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111, is the very interesting feature of explicitly describing doing vipassana, while one is in the jhāna and the first 3 formless attainments. LBT (late buddhist text) apologists, as well as Sujato, Brahm, claim that the suttas describe a jhāna where one enters a disembodied, frozen state, where vipassana is impossible until one emerges from that 'jhāna'.  Since Sujato translated all the suttas, let's take a look at what he translated, and how it supports his interpretation of 'jhāna'.  AN 9.36: Jhānasutta—Bhikkhu Sujato (suttacentral.net) ‘The first absorption is a basis for ending the defilements.’ ‘Paṭhamampāhaṁ,   bhikkhave,   jhānaṁ   nissāya   āsavānaṁ   khayaṁ   vadāmī’ti,   iti   kho   panetaṁ   vuttaṁ. That’s what I said, but why did I say it? Kiñcetaṁ   paṭicca   vuttaṁ? Take a mendicant who, q uite secluded from sensual pleasures, secluded from unskill...

Pāḷi and Sanskrit definition of Viveka

  'Viveka', Sanskrit dictionary Primary meaning is ‘discrimination’. Other meanings:  (1) true knowledge,  (2) discretion,  (3) right judgement,  (4) the faculty of distinguishing and classifying things according to their real properties’. Wikipedia (sanskrit dictionary entry 'viveka') Viveka (Sanskrit: विवेक, romanized: viveka) is a Sanskrit and Pali term translated into English as discernment or discrimination.[1] According to Rao and Paranjpe, viveka can be explained more fully as: Sense of discrimination; wisdom; discrimination between the real and the unreal, between the self and the non-self, between the permanent and the impermanent; discriminative inquiry; right intuitive discrimination; ever present discrimination between the transient and the permanent.[2]: 348  The Vivekachudamani is an eighth-century Sanskrit poem in dialogue form that addresses the development of viveka. Within the Vedanta tradition, there is also a concept of vichara which is one t...