Skip to main content

cats exercising (V&V) vitakka and vicara, (S&S) sati and sampajano, and dhamma-vicaya


(1) Two minute video, 'Fluffy' the hero cat saves old man's life





Summary of above video and details of how V&V, S&S, dhamma vicaya were evident.

cat's name is 'fluffy.' 

whenever the old man's cell phone rang, he'd talk to his cat and say, "ring a ding, fluffy." So the cat knew that phrase of speech/vaca was a ringing cell phone.

old man fell in shower and couldn't move for 16 hours. He knew he'd be dead if  he couldn't call for help. So in last ditch effort, he calls out to his cat, "ring a ding, fluffy." 5 minutes later, the cat had pushed the phone off the counter and moved it to where the old man could reach the phone and call for help, saving his life.

Obviously the cat had sati, remembering that the vocalized speech vaca "ring a ding, fluffy" was associated with ringing cell phone. The cat had sampajano and dhammavicaya, lucidly discerning how that memory could be used to help the old man, and understanding that a cell phone could communicate with other people. And the cat must have been using vitakka and vicara, as an intermediary thoughts between vaca, V&V as vaci-sankhara, and the perceptions and attention that could comprehend the meaning of that human speech. 


In the remaining videos, you can work out the same logic in how V&V, S&S, dhamma vicaya are being used.

 



(2) 5 min. video cat prevents baby from falling off ledge 



summary of above video:

What's really clear is the cat totally understands what's going on, and is so gentle in carrying out the compassionate response. When the baby first reaches for the rail, the cat looks at the dad (camera man with cell phone on couch) as if to say, "what are you doing lying on that couch you negligent parent?" 

When the dad doesn't do anything, the cat steps in to help. Fully aware his claws are sharp, notice how he gently pushes the baby's arm down, and then repeatedly gentle and patient when the baby tries to climb up.



(3) 1 min. video, cat jumps on baby to prevent it from going down stairs, then blocks the stair entrance.




(4) 4 min. video, cat saves baby's life. 





summary of above video:

when baby was turning blue and gasping for air, cat ran down to try to get mom's attention jumping into her lap a few times. That didn't work, so the cat ran back into the baby's room, got right up next to the baby monitor (microphone on 24hr to hear baby in crib) and screeched and hissed so loud that the mom came up to investigate, then noticed the baby in trouble. 







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex