Skip to main content

"orthodox", "classical" Theravada Buddhism

 

Re: What does it mean to interpret Suttas according to classical vs non-classical way?

Post by frank k » 

BrokenBones wrote: ↑Sun Jan 08, 2023 3:29 amNon-classical refers to what was recited at the First Council. Classical refers to the Commentaries that appeared later... I know it sounds odd but that's the gist.
"Classical" is just a euphemism people created to try to feel better about themselves.

I think non-classical may also be referring to modern (after "classical" period), which may be subject to other sources of views that deviate from "orthodox".
For example, modern secular may have heretical beliefs such as no karma, no rebirth.
What you're referring to with first council, is EBT (early buddhist teachings) before Abhidhamma became part of the Theravada canon.

Both "classical" and "orthodox" are LBT (later buddhist teachings) that came after EBT.
EBT was before Abhidhamma was added to canon.
EBT was before Theravada "orthodox" commentary was considered authoritative interpretation of the Buddha's teaching.

The problem is, Both "classical" and "orthodox" contain gross and very obvious contradictions with the EBT.
So if you want to take them as authoritative, know that those labels are just euphemisms and propaganda for those schools to pretend their lineage is pure and authentic interpretations of the Buddha's word.
Much like how Mahayana, Vajrayana, modern secular Buddhism all contain new ideas that contradict the EBT, but they lie to themselves in order to believe that their version of Buddhism is a legitimate interpretation of the Buddha's original teachings.

Pretty much just human nature.
No one wants to believe they're following a deviant heterodox version of Buddhism that contain gross contradictions with the Buddha's original teachings.

From the point of view of EBT, "orthodox classical Theravada" is heretical non-orthodox in many important respects.
And the label "Theravada" (sayings of the elders), is quite a joke because those "elders" ignored and contradicted THEIR elders!


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha...
Post a Comment
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a...
Post a Comment
Read more

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex...
Post a Comment
Read more