Skip to main content

TITWOW syndrome example with 'sati' ("mindfulness") and 'google'

Using 'google' to illustrate problem of 'sati' as 'mindfulness'

If I were to say, "use google", or "google that." 

Imagine if I was to translate that phrase for English speakers 2000 years from now.

Maybe I would translate "search" or "find" for 'google'.

Do you see the problem?

"find that." leaves the questions of:

 "what should I be finding?"

"where should I be looking?"

"when should I be doing this?"


This is the TITWOW Syndrome : TITWOW = Translators Irritatingly Translate With One Word 


It's not enough to just translate 'google' with 'find', I need to state what key word I'm searching for, if it's not explicitly stated near the phrase 'google that', 

and I need to explain the context for the future readers that google searches a database of world human knowledge from 1000 CE to 2020 CE for example.


Similarly, 'sati' is not just 'mindfulness'. You need to explain what we're supposed to be mindful of, what's the range of that (local, world, mental, etc.),  and when. 


Hardly anyone knows what we're suppose to be 'mindful' of, even Buddhists 


'Sati' translated with the single word 'mindfulness' is one of the biggest causes of why most people, including  Buddhists, don't have a clear and correct understanding of what 'sati' is, as the Buddha originally defined it. 

TITWOW Syndrome : TITWOW = Translators Irritatingly Translate With One Word 


The problem is, it's not enough to just translate word for word here, sati -> mindfulness.

With each occurence of 'sati' in the suttas, there are unstated supporting actors and context.

Who is doing 'sati', with respect to what? 

supported by and by means of what? 

and when? 


In the EBT (early buddhist teachings), sati defined by the Buddha means:

You remember and apply The Dhamma not just in the present moment, but at all times.


'remember' means both memorizing and recollecting

'remember' means both the act of commiting relevant information to memory, and recalling relevant information to mind to the present moment as needed ("keeping it in mind", "mindfulness"). 


'The Dhamma' means

The Dhamma is the Buddha's teaching that leads to nirvana.

In the more specific context of exactly how 'sati' expects 'Dhamma' to be formulated,

If no specific Dhamma instruction is stated where the 'sati' term appears in the sutta passage, 

the default value of 'The Dhamma'

are the four satipaṭṭhāna formula, as stated in SN 47.2.

Other suttas state that one is to do sati all the time. Any time you're not doing sati, you're in grave danger.


One way to avoid the TITWOW syndrome for translating 'sati'.

I translate 'sati' everywhere in the suttas as, "remembering and applying The Dhamma".

That works everywhere. 

Try it out.


Related

Two ways in which sati ("mindfulness") is R.A.D.

(r.a.d. = remember and apply Dhamma)


Forum discussion


Nice point. That's quite the well-crafted acronym, btw. Who hasn't been pleasantly surprised seeing a member of the the Paridae family of small passerine birds which occur mainly in the Northern Hemisphere and Africa?


User avatar
level 2

another interesting things about chickadees (tits):

The tits make a variety of calls and songs. They are amongst the most vocal of all birds, calling continuously in most situations, so much so that they are only ever silent for specific reasons such as avoiding predators or when intruding on a rival's territory. Quiet contact calls are made while feeding to facilitate cohesion with others in their social group.[5] Other calls are used for signalling alarm—a well-known example being the "chic-a-dee-dee" of North American species in the genus Poecile, the call which gives them their local common name, the chickadee. The call also serves as a rallying call to summon others to mob and harass the predator. The number of "dee" syllables at the end of the call increases with the level of danger the predator poses.[10]

Similarly, my acronym TITWOW serves as a rallying cry for people to carefully examine and question translations and interpretation of sutta passages





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex