Skip to main content

🔗📝🦍☯Dharma: four mobile truths to supplement the 4 noble ones

 

4👑☸☯🦍 qigor 🦍☯Dharma


I'm in the process of assembling  various articles on exercises to help sitting meditators into a single book.

It's a work in progress, won't be in a state I'd really want to print into a book for another 10 years, but a gorilla (guerrilla) is all about usefulness and practicality.
People need to know important info now, not  in 10 years.

🦍☯ You can see from the yin yang symbol, that it's differentiated and  segregated from EBT Buddha Dhamma.
It's not even on lucid24.org main page, you have to dig down a level through misc. to get to it.

I pun on 4 mobile truths and mobile eightfold path to borrow the memory structure of things serious Buddhists have already memorized, to aid memory of important health and exercise principles,

gorilla Dharma is in no way intended to replace Buddha Dharma or imply the Buddha is deficient in some way. 

Where the Taoists and Buddhists tend to differ on the issue of physical health, 
the Taoists believe you need a healthy physical body to attain enlightenment.
The Buddha offered very little in terms of physical exercise other than walking a lot, eating in moderation, and alternating between walking, standing, and sitting postures as needed (without giving any detail on how). 

The impression one gets in the Buddha's suttas, is that one should be assiduous (appamada) all the time, giving the Dharma everything you got every moment, even at the expense of physical health from lack of plentiful sleep and nutrition. 

Better to die prematurely from poor physical health and have the right mindset to urgently strive for nirvana,
while developing grit, mental toughness to bear the natural pains that come with aging and decay, 
than to risk investing too much energy and time preserving a physical body one will have to discard in short time (even if one lives to be 120 yr), and becoming attached to a body, attached to comfort and health. 

Between those two extremes (of Taoist and Buddhist), there's the fact that you can't experience quality 4 jhānas, without a sufficiently healthy body. 

So unless you're a masochist, it is of value to learn some health principles from western and eastern medical science that will allow you to practice the pleasurable way of practice in EBT Buddhism, whether it's slow or fast. (AN 4 sutta ref. I believe for 4 ways of practice).





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex