Skip to main content

AN 1.583 B. Sujato accidentally translated vitakka & vicara correctly


https://suttacentral.net/an1.575-615/en/sujato

This passage is talking about second jhana. The pacification of body and mind confirms it (passaddhi-sam-bojjhanga). As well as the statement, vitakka-vicārā-pi vÅ«pasammanti, which is straight from the second jhana formula. 

AN 1 .583 B. Sujato

“When one thing, mendicants, is developed and cultivated the body and mind become tranquil, thinking and considering settle down, and all of the qualities that play a part in realization are fully developed. “Ekadhamme, bhikkhave, bhāvite bahulÄ«kate kāyopi passambhati, cittampi passambhati, vitakka-vicārā-pi vÅ«pasammanti, kevalāpi vijjābhāgiyā dhammā bhāvanāpāripÅ«riṃ gacchanti. What one thing? Katamasmiṃ ekadhamme? 

Mindfulness of the body. Kāyagatāya satiyā. When this one thing is developed and cultivated, the body and mind become tranquil, thinking and considering settle down, and all of the qualities that play a part in realization are fully developed.” Imasmiṃ kho, bhikkhave, ekadhamme bhāvite bahulÄ«kate kāyopi passambhati, cittampi passambhati, vitakkavicārāpi vÅ«pasammanti, kevalāpi vijjābhāgiyā dhammā bhāvanāpāripÅ«riṃ gacchantÄ«”ti.



Normally, when B. Sujato realizes 4 jhanas are being described with code phrases (not explicitly calling out which of the 4 jhanas), such as in AN 8.63, he uses the wrong translation/interpretation of vitakka and vicara as "placing the mind and keeping it connected".

AN 8.63 B. Sujato

When this immersion is well developed and cultivated in this way, you should develop it while placing the mind and keeping it connected. You should develop it without placing the mind, but just keeping it connected. You should develop it without placing the mind or keeping it connected. You should develop it with rapture. You should develop it without rapture. You should develop it with pleasure. You should develop it with equanimity. 
Yato kho te, bhikkhu, ayaṃ samādhi evaṃ bhāvito hoti bahulīkato, tato tvaṃ, bhikkhu, imaṃ samādhiṃ sa-vitakkampi sa-vicāraṃ bhāveyyāsi, avitakkampi vicāramattaṃ bhāveyyāsi, avitakkampi avicāraṃ bhāveyyāsi, sappītikampi bhāveyyāsi, nippītikampi bhāveyyāsi, sātasahagatampi bhāveyyāsi, upekkhāsahagatampi bhāveyyāsi.



The moral of the story


If you're going to misinterpret and mistranslate important pali terms, you need to be consistent and comprehensive, otherwise you're going to get caught and look like you lack conviction in your wrong view.



AN 1.583 translated and interpreted correctly


(This is 2nd jhāna here, done in conjunction with kāyagatā-sati)


583
583
“Eka-dhamme, bhikkhave, bhāvite bahulÄ«kate
“When one ☸Dharma, monks, is developed and cultivated
kāyopi passambhati, cittampi passambhati,
the body and mind become pacified,
vitakka-vicārā-pi vūpasammanti,
thinking and considering settle down,
kevalāpi vijjābhāgiyā dhammā
and all of the ☸Dharmas that play a part in realization
Bhāvanā-pāripūriṃ gacchanti.
are developed to perfection.
Katamasmiṃ ekadhamme?
What one ☸Dharma?
Kāya-gatāya satiyā.
Body-immersed remembering.
Imasmiṃ kho, bhikkhave, eka-dhamme bhāvite bahulīkate
When this one ☸Dharma is developed and cultivated,
kāyopi passambhati, cittampi passambhati,
the body and mind become pacified,
Vitakka-vicārāpi vūpasammanti,
thinking and considering settle down,
kevalāpi vijjābhāgiyā dhammā
and all of the ☸Dharmas that play a part in realization
bhāvanāpāripÅ«riṃ gacchantÄ«”ti.
are developed to perfection.”


Comments

  1. Looking at the context of the entire sutta-pitaka, the function of vitakka is closely connected with "knowing the Dhamma by rote," "rehearsing the Dhamma by verbal recitation," "well-learnedness," "repeating the Dhammic instructions as one has learned them from a teacher so that they structure one's present practice"...
    Whereas vicara involves a more nuanced investigation and exploration of the Dhamma instructions in question.
    Such an understanding fits well with the fact that people have their hearts uplifted by teaching, listening to, or thinking about the Dhamma and gone into a jhanic state therefrom. It is also the one consistent interpretation of vitakka-vicara that could practically work in all early Buddhist contexts.
    A straightforward comparison between the aforementioned interpretation on the one hand, and Sujato's interpretation on the other, will clearly show the consistency, cogency, and coherence of the former.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lucid24.org: What's new?

Link to lucid24.org home page :    4šŸ‘‘☸   Remember, you may have to click the refresh button on your web browser navigation bar at to get updated website. 2026 1-30 Overhauled the DN, MN, SN menu pages - Supreme navigation January 30, 2026 2025 12-16 2025-12 December: Major update on look and feel of Lucid24.org 2024 9-17 Lots of new stuff in the last 2 and a half years.  Too many to list. Main one justifying new blog entry, is redesign of home page. Before, it was designed to please me, super dense with everything in one master control panel. I've redesigned it to be friendly to newbies and everyone really. Clear structure, more use of space.  At someone's request, I added a lucid24.org google site search at top of home page. 2022 4-14 Major update to lucid24.org, easy navigation of suttas, quicklink: the ramifications 4-2 new feature lucid24.org sutta quick link 3-28 A new translation of SN 38.16, and first jhāna is a lot easier than you think šŸ”—šŸ“notes relat...

AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111: How does Ajahn Brahm and Sujato's "Jhāna" work here?

What these 3 suttas have in common, AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111, is the very interesting feature of explicitly describing doing vipassana, while one is in the jhāna and the first 3 formless attainments. LBT (late buddhist text) apologists, as well as Sujato, Brahm, claim that the suttas describe a jhāna where one enters a disembodied, frozen state, where vipassana is impossible until one emerges from that 'jhāna'.  Since Sujato translated all the suttas, let's take a look at what he translated, and how it supports his interpretation of 'jhāna'.  AN 9.36: Jhānasutta—Bhikkhu Sujato (suttacentral.net) ‘The first absorption is a basis for ending the defilements.’ ‘Paį¹­hamampāhaṁ,   bhikkhave,   jhānaṁ   nissāya   āsavānaṁ   khayaṁ   vadāmÄ«’ti,   iti   kho   panetaṁ   vuttaṁ. That’s what I said, but why did I say it? KiƱcetaṁ   paį¹­icca   vuttaṁ? Take a mendicant who, q uite secluded from sensual pleasures, secluded from unskill...

My thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, and the solution

HHDL = His holiness, the Dalai Lama I've collected good references here, including the actual video, and snippets from forums discussions containing valid critcism and explanations of cultural context, and most importantly, what the rules of the actual vinaya that buddhist monks are supposed to follow: 1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue At the time of this writing, HHDL is about 88 years old. He has an exemplary record devoting his life to compassionate service to all living beings,  as a Tibetan Buddhist monk. In this age of 'me too',  everyone with a cell phone with high resolution cameras, and the ability to quickly publicize any indiscretion or sexual crime, we've seen sexual predators in positions of power being exposed and convicted. Leaders of large corporations,  governments, professional sports, doctors, leaders in all religions. Tibetan Buddhism has an especially poor track record with corrupt sexual predators. https://thewal...