Skip to main content

what is upasama-anu-s-sati?


what is upasama-anu-s-sati?

Post by frank k » Sun Dec 22, 2019 11:18 am
From AN 1
485–494
Buddhānussatiṃ bhāveti … dhammānussatiṃ bhāveti … saṅghānussatiṃ bhāveti … sīlānussatiṃ bhāveti … cāgānussatiṃ bhāveti … devatānussatiṃ bhāveti … ānāpānassatiṃ bhāveti … maraṇassatiṃ bhāveti … kāyagatāsatiṃ bhāveti … upasamānussatiṃ bhāveti ….
They develop the recollection of the Buddha … the recollection of the teaching … the recollection of the Saṅgha … the recollection of ethical conduct … the recollection of generosity … the recollection of the deities … rememberfulness of breathing … the recollection of death … rememberfulness of the body … the recollection of peace …”
The other items listed, aside from upasama sati, are well known Dharma vitakka (thoughts) with pali suttas that explain how one can use them to engage in the 7sb awakening factor sequence, having sati 'remember' that meditation subject.

But doing DPR search for upasamaanusati only turns up results like above, which only include it in a list of sati subjects, with no explanation. So what exactly is this meditation? How does it work? If upasama is meant as a synonym for nirvana, such as the frequent formula "upasama abhinnayaya sambodhaya nibbanaya samvattati", then it seems really dumb and unnecessary to list that as a meditation topic. If one already has the ability to touch and abide in nirvana, why would you need a Dharma instruction to remember to do that? It's not something you can forget.

My guess, based on the fact that there are no sutta passages that explain what this meditation subject is, is that upasama-anu-sati is a gratuitously added 'sati' to pad the number of sati's on the list to 10. Created by late Theravadans. Also near that AN 1 passage, are 10 kasinas, another late invention/addition.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha...

Lucid24.org: What's new?

Link to lucid24.org home page :    4👑☸   Remember, you may have to click the refresh button on your web browser navigation bar at to get updated website. 2024 9-17 Lots of new stuff in the last 2 and a half years.  Too many to list. Main one justifying new blog entry, is redesign of home page. Before, it was designed to please me, super dense with everything in one master control panel. I've redesigned it to be friendly to newbies and everyone really. Clear structure, more use of space.  At someone's request, I added a lucid24.org google site search at top of home page. 2022 4-14 Major update to lucid24.org, easy navigation of suttas, quicklink: the ramifications 4-2 new feature lucid24.org sutta quick link 3-28 A new translation of SN 38.16, and first jhāna is a lot easier than you think 🔗📝notes related to Jhāna force and J.A.S.I. effect AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111: How does Ajahn Brahm and Sujato's "Jhāna" work here? 3-13 Added to EBPedia J.A.S.I. ('Jazzy...

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a...