Skip to main content

why does 16aps breath meditation only supress vitakka, and not vicara?


Re: detailed audit showing even in Vism. vitakka in 31 body parts and first jhana means 'thinking', not 'initial applica

Post by frank k » Tue Mar 03, 2020 9:46 am
That's a tough passage to understand, but I don't really understand how that supports your case.
Volo wrote: ↑
Tue Mar 03, 2020 6:27 am
...So, Vimuttimagga is indeed in a good accordance with Vism in treating vitakka, and clearly distinguishes vitakka as jhāna factor from vitakka as thinking.
definition of discursive:
1.
digressing from subject to subject.

Here's the passage again, expanded a little so you can see the context better. It's explaining how 4sp satipatthana fulfills 7sb awakening factors, and why anapana is said to remove vitakka (discursive thinking). Clearly is talking about MN 118, the latter part of the sutta.
THE SEVEN ENLIGHTENMENT FACTORS
Q. How are the seven enlightenment factors fulfilled through the practice of the four foundations of mindfulness?
A. If the yogin practises the (four) foundations of mindfulness, he is able to abide non-confused in mindfulness; this is called the enlightenment factor of mindfulness. That yogin, abiding in mindfulness, investigates subjection to ill, impermanence and phenomena; this is called the enlightenment factor of inquiry into states. Inquiring into states (dhammd) thus, he strives earnestly without slackening; this is called the enlightenment factor of exertion. Developing exertion, he arouses joy (PÄ«ti) that is clean; this is called the enlightenment factor of joy (PÄ«ti). Through the mind being full of joy (PÄ«ti), his body and mind are endowed with calm; this is called the enlightenment factor of calm. Through calmness his body attains to ease and his mind is possessed of concentration; this is called the enlightenment factor of concentration. Owing to concentration, the mind acquires equanimity; this is called the enlightenment factor of equanimity. Thus because of the practice of the four foundations of mindfulness, the seven enlightenment factors are fulfilled.

Q. How are freedom and wisdom fulfilled through the practice of the seven enlightenment factors ?
The yogin who has practised the seven enlightenment factors much, gains in a moment the wisdom of the Path and the Fruit of freedom. Thus because of the practice of the seven enlightenment factors, wisdom and freedom are fulfilled.
A. All formations are endowed with directed thought (vitakka) according to planes.
Q. That being so, why is only directed thought (vitakka) suppressed in mindfulness of respiration, and not the other (vicara) ?
A. It is used here in a different sense. Discursiveness is a hindrance to meditation, jhāna. In this sense, it is suppressed. Why is air contact pleasant ? Because it calms the mind. It is comparable to the soothing of a heavenly musician's (gandhabba's) mind with sweet sounds. By this discursive thinking is suppressed. And again, it is like a person walking along the bank of a river. His mind is collected, is directed towards one object and does not wander. Therefore in mindfulness of respiration, the suppression of discursive thinking is taught.
Mindfulness of respiration has ended.
What this passage is talking about (the part Volo is questioning), is the that vitakka in first jhana, being somewhat discursive in nature, can change meditation topics as needs arise (see AN 8.63). For example, one could use vitakka to switch from anapana to metta, to 4sp.
Since we are now fixed (appana in the original sense of the word) on the topic of anapana breath meditation, and are happily absorbed in first jhana, there is no longer a need for vitakka to discursively consider and switch to another meditation topic. But vicara is still active in first jhana of anapanasati, to consider/ponder/evaluate subtle aspects of the breath that are relevant to once perception of breath (saƱƱa) in first jhana.

The simile at the end of the passage, which Volo neglected to include, makes all this clear. It's not that the ability to think 'discursively' (change meditation topics) is impossible in anapana first jhana, it's just that the nature of anapana and kayagata, is that by one's attention pleasurably engaged in observing physical processesses, there is no desire or need to change meditation topics.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha
Post a Comment
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a
Post a Comment
Read more

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex
Post a Comment
Read more