Skip to main content

SN 22.29, new Buddha's Grove website, oral tradition, purpose of redundancy in suttas: brainwashing

 

Nice new website here, by Javier.

https://sites.google.com/view/buddhasgrove/method

(actually, I don't know if the site is new, I don't see any dates on there, but it's new to me)


One thing that needs pointing out. There is a place for abbreviated sutta translations with repetitions cut out or elided. It serves a useful purpose. You can more quickly digest the gist of the sutta and not lose the main points from getting lost in thinking out the repetitions.

But there's a super important reason, actually at least 2 reasons, for the repetitions. 

One, it's on an oral tradition, so repetitions help you to memorize the teaching and help catch errors when reciting repetitions sounds different or slightly off. 

Two, and most important, the repetition is a positive brainwashing in the best sense of the concept. 

You're washing out the akusala/unskillful, and replacing the washed mind with kusala skillful thoughts and perceptions. This sutta for example illustrates the point:


SN 22.29

The repetition isn't just for memorization, after you memorize it, you're meant to recite it frequently, recalling what you memorized (sati), thinking about it (Dhamma-vicaya vocally or vitakka/mentally reciting the teaching), evaluating/pondering (vicara) the Dharma passage more deeply, and let it do it's work washing out your brain.

The sutta above, I've recited it for hours on end without getting tired of the repetition because it's giving a reminder every moment  that's timely and needed. 

Think about what humans are going through every moment. Are they delighting in dukkha, or are they actively seeking out dukkha and getting burned again and again? It's insane when you really examine how you spend most of your day, breaking it down second by second.  SN 22.29 is a reminder of what we should be doing every moment, that people are constantly forgetting to do. Instead people are doing the exact opposite... delighting in dukkha.



Comments

  1. Thx frank
    I'll start to recite and memorize suttas after reading this.

    Best regards!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex