Skip to main content

Re: Question regarding the terminology 'discursive thought'

 

Re: Question regarding the terminology 'discursive thought'

Post by frank k » 

See KN Pe 7.72 explanations of vitakka and vicara.
http://lucid24.org/sted/8aam/8samadhi/v ... ndex.html
'discursive' means digressing from topic to topic.
So that's not 'vicara' in samadhi context. In EBT, it would be the job of sati and sampajano to reign in vitakka (directed-thought) from digressing discursively.
vitakka, inside first jhana, is selecting a topic to think about superficially, recalling a memorized Dharma topic and mentally reciting it with verbal thinking. Vicara takes the topic of thought selected by vitakka and evaluates/examines/ponders it more deeply.
So for first jhana context, it's carefully delimited in that way. If there is a digression from the Dharma topic in first jhana, you wouldn't say it was vicara that digressed, it would be a separate vitakka starting up a different Dharma topic.

Really the issue with jhana samadhi is whether discursive digression is intentional or not. If it is, for example consciously switching from breath mediation to asubha meditation, that's fine. Unintentional and unwanted discursiveness is the opposite of samadhi.
See MN 20 ending, which sums up the issue nicely.
Unfortunately many meditation teachers don't get the distinction, and just lump all thinking, discursive or otherwise, as an artifact of low quality samadhi. They demonize all verbal thought, and fetishize a wrong samadhi of frozen stupor.

http://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/20 ... rahm.html

wolf22 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:26 amHi everybody,

I have a question regarding vicara or 'discursive thought'. I know it has a somewhat different meaning in different circumstances where it pertains moreso to the 'movement of concentration' than actual (verbal) thinking/fabrications but is the latter I am interested in here.
...
www.lucid24.org/sted : ☸Lucid24.org🐘 STED definitions


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha...
Post a Comment
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a...
Post a Comment
Read more

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex...
Post a Comment
Read more