Skip to main content

sujato translation error AN 6.72

Where I highlighted 'skilled', it should be "NOT skilled"

 

AN 6.72: Balasutta—Bhikkhu Sujato (suttacentral.net)



 What six?

Katamehi chahi?It’s when a mendicant is not skilled in entering immersion, skilled in remaining in immersion, or skilled in emerging from immersion. And they don’t practice carefully and persistently, and they don’t do what’s suitable.Idha, bhikkhave, bhikkhu na samādhissa samāpattikusalo hoti, na samādhissa ṭhitikusalo hoti, na samādhissa vuṭṭhānakusalo hoti, asakkaccakārī ca hoti, asātaccakārī ca, asappāyakārī ca.A mendicant who has these six qualities can’t attain strength in immersion.Imehi kho, bhikkhave, chahi dhammehi samannāgato bhikkhu : 


Tracking other errors here:




Bodhi's translation for comparison, reformatted neatly so errors are easy to spot


6.72 – AN 6.72 (8) Strength


“Bhikkhus, possessing six qualities a bhikkhu is incapable of attaining strength in concentration.
What six?
(1) Here, a bhikkhu is not skilled in the attainment of concentration;
(2) he is not skilled in the duration of concentration;
(3) he is not skilled in emergence from concentration;
(4) he does not practice carefully;
(5) he does not practice persistently;
and (6) he does not do what is suitable.
Possessing these six qualities, a bhikkhu is incapable of attaining strength in concentration.

“Bhikkhus, possessing six qualities a bhikkhu is capable of attaining strength in concentration.
What six?
[428] (1) Here, a bhikkhu is skilled in the attainment of concentration;
(2) he is skilled in the duration of concentration;
(3) he is skilled in emergence from concentration;
(4) he practices carefully;
(5) he practices persistently;
and (6) he does what is suitable.
Possessing these six qualities, a bhikkhu is capable of attaining strength in concentration.”


I've caught a number of Sujato translation errors in other suttas that are a result of...


Trying to really shave words off  English translation being concise and fluent.
Whereas Bodhi above, is less fluent and follows the oral tradition boring matrix style of listing things.

The boring style is less fluent, but it aids in memorization (important for oral tradition), and also makes it easy to spot and catch errors in accuracy of memorized Dhamma.

I'm not trying to be negatively critical of Sujato here, since concision and fluency has its proper place and tiime.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha...
Post a Comment
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lucid24.org: What's new?

Link to lucid24.org home page :    4👑☸   Remember, you may have to click the refresh button on your web browser navigation bar at to get updated website. 2024 9-17 Lots of new stuff in the last 2 and a half years.  Too many to list. Main one justifying new blog entry, is redesign of home page. Before, it was designed to please me, super dense with everything in one master control panel. I've redesigned it to be friendly to newbies and everyone really. Clear structure, more use of space.  At someone's request, I added a lucid24.org google site search at top of home page. 2022 4-14 Major update to lucid24.org, easy navigation of suttas, quicklink: the ramifications 4-2 new feature lucid24.org sutta quick link 3-28 A new translation of SN 38.16, and first jhāna is a lot easier than you think 🔗📝notes related to Jhāna force and J.A.S.I. effect AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111: How does Ajahn Brahm and Sujato's "Jhāna" work here? 3-13 Added to EBPedia J.A.S.I. ('Jazzy...
3 comments
Read more