Skip to main content

khattiyo seṭṭho: The warrior-noble class is the best (among brahman, merchant, slave, untouchable classes). Why?

 I'm busy at the moment to research this further, but wondering if anyone knows the annswer to the question, why is the warrior-noble class the best?


SN 21.11 Mahākappina: With Mahākappina


11. Mahākappinasutta
11. With Mahākappina
Sāvatthiyaṃ viharati.
At Sāvatthī.
Atha kho āyasmā mahākappino yena bhagavā tenupasaṅkami.
Then Venerable Mahākappina went to see the Buddha.
Addasā kho bhagavā āyasmantaṃ mahākappinaṃ dūratova āgacchantaṃ.
The Buddha saw him coming off in the distance,
Disvāna bhikkhū āmantesi:
and addressed the monks:
“passatha no tumhe, bhikkhave, etaṃ bhikkhuṃ āgacchantaṃ odātakaṃ tanukaṃ tuṅganāsikan”ti?
“monks, do you you see that monk coming—white, thin, with a pointy nose?”
“Evaṃ, bhante”.
“Yes, sir.”
“Eso kho, bhikkhave, bhikkhu mahiddhiko mahānubhāvo.
“That monk is very mighty and powerful. It’s not easy to find an attainment that he has not already attained.
Na ca sā samāpatti sulabharūpā yā tena bhikkhunā asamāpannapubbā.
Yassa catthāya kulaputtā sammadeva agārasmā anagāriyaṃ pabbajanti tadanuttaraṃ brahmacariyapariyosānaṃ diṭṭheva dhamme sayaṃ abhiññā sacchikatvā upasampajja viharatī”ti.
And he has realized the supreme end of the spiritual path in this very life. He lives having achieved with his own insight the goal for which people from good families rightly go forth from the lay life to homelessness.”
Idamavoca bhagavā.
That is what the Buddha said.
Idaṃ vatvāna sugato athāparaṃ etadavoca satthā:
Then the Holy One, the Teacher, went on to say:
“Khattiyo seṭṭho janetasmiṃ,
“The warrior-noble is best of those people
ye gottapaṭisārino;
who take clan as the standard.
Vijjācaraṇasampanno,
But one accomplished in knowledge and conduct
so seṭṭho devamānuse.
is best of gods and humans.
Divā tapati ādicco,
The sun shines by day,
rattimābhāti candimā;
the moon glows at night,
Sannaddho khattiyo tapati,
the warrior-noble shines in armor,
jhāyī tapati brāhmaṇo;
and the brahmin shines in jhāna.
Atha sabbamahorattiṃ,
But all day and all night,
buddho tapati tejasā”ti.
the Buddha shines with glory.”


other suttas using that phrase "warrior-noble caste is the best"

Vin

DN

DN 13. ambaṭṭhasuttaṃkhattiyaseṭṭhabhāvo (DN 3.9), para. 6 

khattiyo seṭṭho janetasmiṃ,


DN 13. ambaṭṭhasuttaṃkhattiyaseṭṭhabhāvo (DN 3.9), para. 11 

khattiyo seṭṭho janetasmiṃ,


DN 34. aggaññasuttaṃbodhipakkhiyabhāvanā (DN 27.16), para. 4 

khattiyo seṭṭho janetasmiṃ, ye gottapaṭisārino.


DN 34. aggaññasuttaṃbodhipakkhiyabhāvanā (DN 27.16), para. 7 

khattiyo seṭṭho janetasmiṃ, ye gottapaṭisārino.


MN

MN 21. gahapativaggo3. sekhasuttaṃ (MN 53.1), para. 17 

khattiyo seṭṭho janetasmiṃ, ye gottapaṭisārino.


SN

SN 16. brahmasaṃyuttaṃ2. dutiyavaggo1. sanaṅkumārasuttaṃ (SN 6.11), para. 2 

khattiyo seṭṭho janetasmiṃ, ye gottapaṭisārino.


SN 210. bhikkhusaṃyuttaṃ11. mahākappinasuttaṃ (SN 21.11), para. 3 

khattiyo seṭṭho janetasmiṃ, ye gottapaṭisārino.


AN

AN 111. nissayavaggo10. moranivāpasuttaṃ (AN 11.10), para. 6 

khattiyo seṭṭho janetasmiṃ, ye gottapaṭisārino.


AN 111. nissayavaggo10. moranivāpasuttaṃ (AN 11.10), para. 9 

khattiyo seṭṭho janetasmiṃ, ye gottapaṭisārino.


KN


Comments

  1. Not a definitive answer, but some thoughts:
    Perhaps khattiya is considered the highest of the castes because being born into the khattiya caste is the ripening of good past kamma, because it usuall enables living in luxury, and having power over others (because of one's livelihood). Therefore, being born into a royal family is preferable to or more fortunate than being born in the other castes.
    One could even say that it is the best possible result for birth as a human, at least in the times and places where royalty had (absolute) power.

    When the Buddha lists results of good past kamma in Iti 22, he lists them in descending order:
    “Having developed a mind of good will for seven years, then for seven eons of contraction & expansion I didn’t return to this world. Whenever the eon was contracting, I entered the [realm of] Radiance. Whenever the eon was expanding, I reappeared in an empty Brahma-abode. There I was Brahma, the Great Brahma, the Unconquered Conqueror, Total Seer, Wielder of Power. Then for thirty-six times I was Sakka, ruler of the gods. For many hundreds of times I was a king, a wheel-turning emperor, a righteous king of Dhamma, conqueror of the four corners of the earth, maintaining stable control over the countryside, endowed with the seven treasures –to say nothing of the times I was a local king.”

    (Note: No mention of being born a brahman/brahmin as fortunate.)

    So after being born as the various levels of brahmās and devas, being a wheel-turning emperor or and being a local king is the highest result possible for good past kamma. The latter two are the options open for birth as a human.

    Now, why aren't brahmins the highest caste?
    This may be because, for the Buddha, being a true brahmin is not something that is achieved by birth or livelihood (even for the other castes, the important thing is not birth per se, but livelihood, which often, however, seems to depend or is at least influenced by birth), but by spiritual attainment, as Snp 3.9 shows:

    “Whoever, among human beings,
    makes a living through priesthood,
    you know him thus, Vāseṭṭha,
    as a sacrificer, not as a brahman. [...]
    I don’t call one a brahman
    for being born of a mother
    or sprung from a womb.
    He’s called a ‘bho-sayer’
    if he has anything at all.
    But someone with nothing,
    who clings to no thing:
    He’s what I call
    a brahman.”

    As for the conventional caste of brahmins, the Buddha says that they have fallen off from their noble livelihood and principles of ancient times, and lived by a "vile livelihood" (i.e. sacrifice) in his times (see e.g. Snp 2.7).

    That my be a reason why the Buddha doesn't consider them to be a high or fortunate caste.
    The knowledge of the three vedas and brahmin "knowledge" seems to be also not highly regarded by the Buddha (see DN 13) and is instead seen as useless and even deceptive.

    In any case, for the Buddha, the real distinguishing characteristic separating people was not birth, but action. The important thing is not what past kamma ripens now (or at birth), but the actions one does now (i.e present kamma)—that is kusala or akusala actions and livelihood and not whether one can command people or is a servant by livelihood.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. great comment, but it is interesting to note that all three of the previous Buddhas in this kappa belongs to the Brahmin caste. I wonder whether they would have agreed with Gotama Buddha's view on the superiority of the Khattiya caste.

      Delete
    2. Perhaps in the time of the past Buddhas, the brahmin caste was still following their ancient noble principles, and the knowledge they had wouldn't have been diluted as it was in the time of our Buddha Gotama. Perhaps in their time the brahim caste would have been the best?

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lucid24.org: What's new?

Link to lucid24.org home page :    4👑☸   Remember, you may have to click the refresh button on your web browser navigation bar at to get updated website. 2024 9-17 Lots of new stuff in the last 2 and a half years.  Too many to list. Main one justifying new blog entry, is redesign of home page. Before, it was designed to please me, super dense with everything in one master control panel. I've redesigned it to be friendly to newbies and everyone really. Clear structure, more use of space.  At someone's request, I added a lucid24.org google site search at top of home page. 2022 4-14 Major update to lucid24.org, easy navigation of suttas, quicklink: the ramifications 4-2 new feature lucid24.org sutta quick link 3-28 A new translation of SN 38.16, and first jhāna is a lot easier than you think 🔗📝notes related to Jhāna force and J.A.S.I. effect AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111: How does Ajahn Brahm and Sujato's "Jhāna" work here? 3-13 Added to EBPedia J.A.S.I. ('Jazzy...

AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111: How does Ajahn Brahm and Sujato's "Jhāna" work here?

What these 3 suttas have in common, AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111, is the very interesting feature of explicitly describing doing vipassana, while one is in the jhāna and the first 3 formless attainments. LBT (late buddhist text) apologists, as well as Sujato, Brahm, claim that the suttas describe a jhāna where one enters a disembodied, frozen state, where vipassana is impossible until one emerges from that 'jhāna'.  Since Sujato translated all the suttas, let's take a look at what he translated, and how it supports his interpretation of 'jhāna'.  AN 9.36: Jhānasutta—Bhikkhu Sujato (suttacentral.net) ‘The first absorption is a basis for ending the defilements.’ ‘Paṭhamampāhaṁ,   bhikkhave,   jhānaṁ   nissāya   āsavānaṁ   khayaṁ   vadāmī’ti,   iti   kho   panetaṁ   vuttaṁ. That’s what I said, but why did I say it? Kiñcetaṁ   paṭicca   vuttaṁ? Take a mendicant who, q uite secluded from sensual pleasures, secluded from unskill...

Pāḷi and Sanskrit definition of Viveka

  'Viveka', Sanskrit dictionary Primary meaning is ‘discrimination’. Other meanings:  (1) true knowledge,  (2) discretion,  (3) right judgement,  (4) the faculty of distinguishing and classifying things according to their real properties’. Wikipedia (sanskrit dictionary entry 'viveka') Viveka (Sanskrit: विवेक, romanized: viveka) is a Sanskrit and Pali term translated into English as discernment or discrimination.[1] According to Rao and Paranjpe, viveka can be explained more fully as: Sense of discrimination; wisdom; discrimination between the real and the unreal, between the self and the non-self, between the permanent and the impermanent; discriminative inquiry; right intuitive discrimination; ever present discrimination between the transient and the permanent.[2]: 348  The Vivekachudamani is an eighth-century Sanskrit poem in dialogue form that addresses the development of viveka. Within the Vedanta tradition, there is also a concept of vichara which is one t...