Skip to main content

Do we need to make an effort to control or should we not try to control our breathing during meditation?

 

Re: Do we need to make an effort to control or should we not try to control our breathing during meditation?

Post by frank k » 

sm2019 wrote: Mon Apr 08, 2024 2:38 amSome people say, in meditation we need to make an effort to make our breathing subtle, deep and slow, while others say we shouldn't try to control our breathing, we should just observe it. What is your opinion on this?
Best way is to try out all options and discover your own conclusions, keep an open mind. Some ways may work in some situations and not others.

I will say in my experience, over 30 years breath meditation and proficiency in jhāna,
I'd always leaned more towards letting the breath be natural and trying not to control it.
In hindsight, I regret that, and wish I trusted Ajahn Lee and Thanissaro's instructions to consciously breathe in a way to spread out breath sensations throughout the whole body.

Why?
Because trying to let the breath be natural and uncontrolled, tends to bias the breath toward shallowness.
And if you breath shallow for a long time, and your body is not strong, robust, it will tend to lead you towards drowsiness (after 20, 30, 60 min.).

So in my situation, and if similar meditators who are already pretty good at relaxed, singular focus, you should also have a longer term bigger view of the whole practice of good physical health, changing postures as needed, adjusting breath as needed to keep body and mind healthy, in order to get a deeper, longer lasting jhāna.

Remember the purpose of breath meditation, and kāyagata (immersed in body while remembering and applying Dharma), is that it drives out unwanted and unprofitable thoughts.
The physical act of being very attentive to breath (or other bodily activity) fills up the attention bandwidth and leaves much less room and energy to explore wrong thoughts.

So if you already skilled at stopping unwanted thoughts, worrying about "not controlling the breath" because the Theras advised against it, is unskillful, since you've already accomplished the main mission of ānāpāna and kāyagatā.

At this point, you should be more concerned of how to refine your practice to enter and deepen jhāna.

Comments

  1. This is excellent advice. After lengthy periods of natural breathing which also led to shallow breathing overall (as you described above), I then had to undergo practices to rectify and fix up breathing in order to strengthen the body. This is a really important point, and rarely discussed.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex