Skip to main content

is nirvana in present moment same as nirvana of arahant after death?

 excerpt from  only 1 way‍ 4.3.10.50 Relevant Suttas on third noble truth and nirvana

Experience of Nibbāna in present moment (before death of arahant)

AN 3.32 similar to AN 10.6 “this is peaceful, exquisite, the setlling of all activities…”, but does not explain how ordinary jhānas and samādhi can experience that nirvana

AN 9.36 while doing 4 jhānas or first 7 perception attainments, one can realize nirvana

amatāya dhātuyā cittaṃ upasaṃharati
citta touching the deathless property,

AN 10.6 nirvana experienced via a samādhi and perception

* not a samādhi that perceives 4 elements, or 4 formless attainments,…

* Buddha perceives nirvana as “peaceful, exquisite, all activities setlled…”

AN 10.7 Sāriputta gives slightly different explanation than Buddha in AN 10.6

AN 11.7 same as AN 10.6 but one more item added

* (11) And they wouldn’t perceive what is seen, heard, thought, cognized, attained, sought, or explored by the mind.

* Sariputta also gives same answer as Buddha in AN 10.6, instead of his unique answer in AN 10.7

AN 11.8 essentially same as AN 11.7, but now gives the key words paying attention (manasi karoti) the same lattitude as the sañña/perception there (to experience nirvana).

* also adds a 12th category to list of exclusion, the 5 sense organs of body and their 5 objects.

AN 11.9 as AN 11.8 added term manasi karoti to samādhi related terms that can perceive Nirvana, this sutta adds “jhāna” and verb jhāyati (do jhāna).

AN 11.18 same as AN 11.7 just different speaker and audience

AN 11.19 same as AN 11.7 just different speaker and audience

AN 11.20 same as AN 11.7 just different speaker and audience

AN 11.21 same as AN 11.7 just different speaker and audience

The point of AN 11.18-21 is to show it’s a common thing for many monks to ask for more detail on the experience of nirvana, and the “this is peaceful…” along with the list of 12 exclusion of what nirvana isn’t, is pretty much the standard accepted answer.

MN 64 same as AN 9.36 but without the archer simile

KN Ud 8.1 nirvana called “āyatana” dimension, referring to the same characteristics as AN 10.6

KN Ud 8.4 (Quoted in MN 144 and SN 35.87, similar passage in SN 12.40 as well)


also see:

etaṃ santaṃ etaṃ paṇītaṃ (this is peaceful, this is exquisite)

anidassana : unclear if viññāna anidassana is exactly the same as the nirvana that can be perceived by a samādhi in the present moment in the suttas above, or is reserved for nirvana after death of an arahant. In MN 49.9.7 not clear if the Buddha used anidassana as the place where Brahma couldn’t find him, because he used psychic powers to project voice to say to Brahma “you can’t see me.” He could have gone to anidassana, and then switched into a more mundane samādhi with psychic power, or only entered a mundane samādhi to escape from Brahma.

AN 9.37.4.4 uncertain if the special kind of samādhi here is perception of nirvana



million dollar question: is the perception of nirvana from a samādhi in the present moment exactly the same as the experience of nirvana for an arahant after their physical death?

The suttas above make it absolutely clear the present moment nirvana is not just ordinary jhāna doing ordinary vitakka or paying attention to ordinary perceptions of being free of greed, hatred, delusion.

(see the exhaustive lists from AN 11 and AN 10 what what perception of nirvana is NOT)

Framing the question in the title in a better way

(not implying an arahant exists after death)

using the terminology of Iti 44, there are two types of nibbana properties. One with remainder (5 bodily senses active), one without remainder (dead).

You would think the nibbana that ariyas who are alive experience of nibbana with remainder, has some qualitative difference than nibbana without remainder.

However, the sutta passages in AN 10 and AN 11 describing how an arahant can experience nirvana with a type of samādhi and perception, exclude four jhānas, four formless attainments, what is seen, heard, sensed, cognized, explored (vicāra), and even 5 bodily senses excluded.

So it would seem in such a state of special samādhi, they are experiencing nibbana without remainder with the 5 bodily senses gone.

Perhaps nirvana with remainder is only referring to when ariya are not in that special samādhi, they enjoy the nibbana of being free of greed, hatred, delusion, but they still have the dukkha that comes with a physical body.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex