Skip to main content

definition: warm fuzzies, warm and fuzzy feeling, 20th century idioms to describe pīti and/or pamojja, and the physical sukha that result

 

Definition of warm fuzzies: feelings of happiness, contentment, or sentimentality


https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/warm%20fuzzies#h1

warm fuzzies: plural noun


Definition of warm fuzzies: feelings of happiness, contentment, or sentimentality

example: got warm fuzzies from the good news



Synonyms

    beatitude, blessedness, bliss, blissfulness, felicity, gladness, happiness, joy


Antonyms

    calamity, ill-being, misery, sadness, unhappiness, wretchedness


First Known Use of warm fuzzies: 1981, in the meaning defined above




warm and fuzzy (urban dictionary)

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=warm%20and%20fuzzy
to have an extremely happy feeling about the girl or guy that you like or love.
girl: Wow you're really attractive
Guy: that makes me feel all warm and fuzzy

guy: hey i really really like you
girl: thanks, that makes me feel all warm and fuzzy



SN 36.31



Origin of 'warm fuzzy', etymology


I have a pretty good guess.
Like  'warm fuzzies' is literally describing pleasant physical sensations in the body, such as in first jhāna or second jhāna (as nirsa misa pīti [mental] that causes nira misa pleasant sukha to arise). 

Whereas the worldly version of 'warm fuzzy', such as the dictionary examples of 'hearing good news' or 'seeing a girl you like', that would be the 'wrong jhāna', the type of jhāna based on 5 hindrances, rather than produced by thoughts in line with skillful Dharmas. Yet the resulting physical sensations of sa-misa pīti and sukha, feel the same since it's just pleasure chemicals in the brain whether the source of the pleasure was skillful Dharma thoughts such as good will, or unskillful lustful thoughts.


Another way to look at is through the Jhāna force equation

jhāna force, and equation‍: quantitative analysis of jhānic force.

Jhānic force pushes a current of heat, energy, and vibrations throughout the body, pervading every cell. And what is heat and vibrations tuned to a comfortable temperature? 

Warm fuzzies. ⏹️





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex