Skip to main content

Why the fuss over LBT and EBT versions of jhāna? Aren't they both 99% Buddha's definition?

(I will expand on this discussion later, but this is just a copy of a discussion between Frank and Sarath)

 


frank k wrote: Thu Apr 27, 2023 2:42 am
SarathW wrote: Mon Jan 15, 2018 1:35 pmThe real question is whether the teaching of Abhidhamma and Visuddhi Magga contain the Buddha's teaching.
My understanding is they both contain Buddha's teaching. (say 99%)
This is no difference to Sutta. Even Sutta does not have 100% representation of what Buddha taught.
I think those monks who discourage their student to study Abhidhamma and Visuddhi Magga are irresponsible.
Even if Ab and Vism. were 99.999% correct, if that 0.001 is wrong in a critical part of core,
it corrupts the entire Dhamma.

Those corruptions in Vism. are not trivial.
they do great harm, have done great harm, continue to do great harm.
https://lucid24.org/sted/8aam/8samadhi/ ... index.html

Vism. redefintion of jhāna doesn't even agree with Ab Vibhanga jhāna!
Ab Vb understands vitakka and vicāra correctly in agreement with EBT.



frank k wrote: Sat Apr 29, 2023 8:56 am

SarathW wrote: Fri Apr 28, 2023 1:05 pm...
What I said was compared with more than one definition.
If you access only one definition that killing someone is the way to union with God then you are a very unfortunate person.
Then again if you do not have the very basic ethics they that also very unfortunate.

You're making an impossible assumption.
If you start off with Vism.'s wrong definition of jhāna,
when you do a real BUddha's jhāna, you're still striving for doing a wrong jhāna, not realizing you've already landed on the Buddha's jhāna continuum.

This has happened to me, and lots of people.
It's tragic, and totally preventable.
But only if wrong viewers acknowledge the truth, confess their errors, and start teaching the right way to jhāna.

When you and others continue being apologists and prioritizing harmony instead of giving truth the proper care it deserves, you are enabling criminal behavior and allowing this horrible crime to continue.

I'm not against harmony, just not at the cost of truth and justice.
Just like we can live harmoniously with christians, muslims.
And Buddha's EBT jhāna practitioners can live in harmony with LBT Vism. redefined "jhāna" practitioners,
but only if the LBT heretics acknowledge their crimes and admit their redefined 'jhāna' is different than the Buddha's EBT jhāna.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lucid24.org: What's new?

Link to lucid24.org home page :    4👑☸   Remember, you may have to click the refresh button on your web browser navigation bar at to get updated website. 2024 9-17 Lots of new stuff in the last 2 and a half years.  Too many to list. Main one justifying new blog entry, is redesign of home page. Before, it was designed to please me, super dense with everything in one master control panel. I've redesigned it to be friendly to newbies and everyone really. Clear structure, more use of space.  At someone's request, I added a lucid24.org google site search at top of home page. 2022 4-14 Major update to lucid24.org, easy navigation of suttas, quicklink: the ramifications 4-2 new feature lucid24.org sutta quick link 3-28 A new translation of SN 38.16, and first jhāna is a lot easier than you think 🔗📝notes related to Jhāna force and J.A.S.I. effect AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111: How does Ajahn Brahm and Sujato's "Jhāna" work here? 3-13 Added to EBPedia J.A.S.I. ('Jazzy...

AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111: How does Ajahn Brahm and Sujato's "Jhāna" work here?

What these 3 suttas have in common, AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111, is the very interesting feature of explicitly describing doing vipassana, while one is in the jhāna and the first 3 formless attainments. LBT (late buddhist text) apologists, as well as Sujato, Brahm, claim that the suttas describe a jhāna where one enters a disembodied, frozen state, where vipassana is impossible until one emerges from that 'jhāna'.  Since Sujato translated all the suttas, let's take a look at what he translated, and how it supports his interpretation of 'jhāna'.  AN 9.36: Jhānasutta—Bhikkhu Sujato (suttacentral.net) ‘The first absorption is a basis for ending the defilements.’ ‘Paṭhamampāhaṁ,   bhikkhave,   jhānaṁ   nissāya   āsavānaṁ   khayaṁ   vadāmī’ti,   iti   kho   panetaṁ   vuttaṁ. That’s what I said, but why did I say it? Kiñcetaṁ   paṭicca   vuttaṁ? Take a mendicant who, q uite secluded from sensual pleasures, secluded from unskill...

Pāḷi and Sanskrit definition of Viveka

  'Viveka', Sanskrit dictionary Primary meaning is ‘discrimination’. Other meanings:  (1) true knowledge,  (2) discretion,  (3) right judgement,  (4) the faculty of distinguishing and classifying things according to their real properties’. Wikipedia (sanskrit dictionary entry 'viveka') Viveka (Sanskrit: विवेक, romanized: viveka) is a Sanskrit and Pali term translated into English as discernment or discrimination.[1] According to Rao and Paranjpe, viveka can be explained more fully as: Sense of discrimination; wisdom; discrimination between the real and the unreal, between the self and the non-self, between the permanent and the impermanent; discriminative inquiry; right intuitive discrimination; ever present discrimination between the transient and the permanent.[2]: 348  The Vivekachudamani is an eighth-century Sanskrit poem in dialogue form that addresses the development of viveka. Within the Vedanta tradition, there is also a concept of vichara which is one t...